AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 35.1 (0.28%)
BR30 39,387 Increased By 124.3 (0.32%)
KSE100 117,807 Increased By 34.4 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,347 Increased By 50.4 (0.14%)

ISLAMABAD: Despite substantial investment in Pakistan’s Gwadar Port, the port has struggled to achieve its desired success due to several issues, including difficulties in transshipment from China, lack of information for promoting the port to Central Asian Republics (CARs), suspension of transit trade with Afghanistan, and non-implementation of the Cabinet’s decision to handle 60 percent of public sector imports through Gwadar, well-informed sources told Business Recorder.

According to sources, Prime Minister’s offices and Minister for Planning, Development, and Special Initiatives, Ahsan Iqbal, are holding regular meetings to make the port fully operational, but several unresolved challenges persist.

To comply with directives to prepare an operationalisation plan for Gwadar Port, the Minister for Planning Development and Special Initiatives recently chaired a meeting that included representatives from all concerned ministries, agencies, and Pakistan’s ambassadors to Central Asian Republics.

Gwadar airport set to reshape economic landscape: PM

The goal of the meeting was to finalize an operationalisation plan for Gwadar Port to be presented to the Prime Minister.

During the meeting, the Minister stressed the need to develop Gwadar Port’s value proposition, including its potential for transit trade, transshipment, and mining exports from Balochistan to CARs. He also emphasized the importance of focused efforts to operationalise the port within six months, three years, and in the long term, in order to brief the Prime Minister and seek final approval.

The Minister instructed Pakistan’s ambassadors to CARs to provide trade outlooks for the region on a prescribed format to help prepare a value proposition for Gwadar Port as a potential transit trade and transshipment hub for CARs.

Sources revealed that Pakistan’s ambassadors to CARs highlighted the lack of information on key opportunities for Gwadar, such as fiscal incentives, infrastructure at the port, and road connectivity to border terminals. The Minister instructed the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Gwadar Port Authority to share this crucial information with Pakistan’s missions in CARs.

The National Logistics Cell (NLC) informed the meeting that it had the necessary capacity and access (through NOCs) to routes leading to the CARs. The Minister directed NLC to develop a competitive business plan that includes detailed information on the cost and time involved in shipments from Gwadar to CARs.

The Member for Infrastructure at the Ministry of Planning, Development & Special Initiatives briefed the meeting on Pakistan’s regional land connectivity and the potential of Gwadar Port for transshipments. The Minister directed the hiring of a professional consultant to formulate a comprehensive operationalisation plan for the port.

Pakistan’s Ambassador to Turkmenistan noted that the Turkmenistan government is currently importing large quantities of white marble from Vietnam. He highlighted the potential for Pakistan, especially Balochistan’s Ziarat White Marble, to tap into this market.

The Minister instructed the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) to hold a consultative meeting with the provincial government of Balochistan to develop a value proposition for the export of Ziarat White Marble to Turkmenistan and share it with Pakistan’s mission in Turkmenistan.

The Minister also announced that a separate meeting would be convened with the Chairman of the China Overseas Port Holding Company (COPHCL) to discuss a marketing plan for Gwadar Port and create a strategy to attract more business and trade.

Sources further revealed that the government had decided that 60% of public sector imports of wheat, sugar, and fertilizer would be routed through Gwadar. A formal notification has been issued, but the decision has yet to be implemented, as these goods have not been imported through the public sector via Gwadar.

Additionally, the suspension of transit trade with Afghanistan and the lack of transshipment of Chinese goods through Gwadar Port under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) due to security concerns have also contributed to the port’s underutilization.

In response, Chairman of the Gwadar Port Authority (GPA), Psand Khan Buledi, who has been attending meetings in Islamabad, stated that regular discussions are being held to address the port’s shortcomings. He emphasized that while the port is operational, efforts are underway to make it fully operational as soon as possible.

“Ships arrive according to demand and supply, and the next shipment is scheduled for January 28, 2025,” he said. Regarding imports from China for export to other countries, Buledi stated that the relevant information may be available with the federal government.

He also confirmed that the GPA has sent letters to all concerned ministries to ensure that 60% of public sector imports of wheat, sugar, and fertilizer are routed through Gwadar Port.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.

Nadeem Sheikh Jan 23, 2025 07:51am
These issues were always there. It is now time to tackle them.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Re=== Jan 23, 2025 08:26pm
Ship from Karachi 100% revenue goes Pakistan. Ship from Gwdar 90% goes to China Holding company and 10% to Pakistan. Is anyone doing the math? Pakistan loses money on every shipment from Gwadar.
thumb_up Recommended (2)
Re=== Jan 23, 2025 09:27pm
"hiring of a professional consultant" Is this a joke. The economics + security of gwadar port are not good. No amount of marketing is gonna fix this. Think about it -- 10 years has passed!!!!No ships
thumb_up Recommended (2)
Re=== Jan 23, 2025 09:28pm
If Gwadar port is cost-effective and secure , no marketing is necessary; ships will start docking to save costs. If economics and security are not fixed, nothing else is going to fix the port.
thumb_up Recommended (2)
Faisal Jan 25, 2025 09:33am
You need a sincerity to achieve
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Mushtaq Hussain Jan 30, 2025 11:37pm
Ziarat white marble is in Mohmand Distt of KP and not Balochistan.
thumb_up Recommended (0)