AIRLINK 157.90 Increased By ▲ 1.78 (1.14%)
BOP 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 7.15 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.42%)
CPHL 84.80 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.8%)
FCCL 45.15 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.12%)
FFL 15.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.41%)
FLYNG 34.49 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (3.45%)
HUBC 136.84 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (0.95%)
HUMNL 12.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.48%)
KEL 4.25 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.16%)
KOSM 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.58%)
MLCF 72.40 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (1.12%)
OGDC 201.30 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (0.54%)
PACE 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.38%)
PAEL 44.07 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.41%)
PIAHCLA 17.05 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.85%)
PIBTL 8.83 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.38%)
POWER 14.95 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.27%)
PPL 149.50 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (0.69%)
PRL 29.70 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.51%)
PTC 21.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.72%)
SEARL 84.38 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.09%)
SSGC 40.10 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
SYM 15.02 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.94%)
TELE 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.86%)
TPLP 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.31%)
TRG 63.89 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.41%)
WAVESAPP 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.56%)
WTL 1.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.75%)
YOUW 3.46 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.17%)
AIRLINK 157.90 Increased By ▲ 1.78 (1.14%)
BOP 10.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.1%)
CNERGY 7.15 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.42%)
CPHL 84.80 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (0.8%)
FCCL 45.15 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.12%)
FFL 15.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.41%)
FLYNG 34.49 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (3.45%)
HUBC 136.84 Increased By ▲ 1.29 (0.95%)
HUMNL 12.82 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.48%)
KEL 4.25 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (2.16%)
KOSM 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.58%)
MLCF 72.40 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (1.12%)
OGDC 201.30 Increased By ▲ 1.08 (0.54%)
PACE 5.17 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (2.38%)
PAEL 44.07 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.41%)
PIAHCLA 17.05 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.85%)
PIBTL 8.83 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.38%)
POWER 14.95 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.27%)
PPL 149.50 Increased By ▲ 1.02 (0.69%)
PRL 29.70 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.51%)
PTC 21.00 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.72%)
SEARL 84.38 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (1.09%)
SSGC 40.10 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.17%)
SYM 15.02 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.94%)
TELE 7.05 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.86%)
TPLP 8.49 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.31%)
TRG 63.89 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (0.41%)
WAVESAPP 8.92 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.56%)
WTL 1.35 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.75%)
YOUW 3.46 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.17%)
BR100 12,149 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 35,394 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 114,755 Increased By 653.2 (0.57%)
KSE30 35,004 Increased By 195 (0.56%)

ISLAMABAD: A brewing dispute between the Balochistan government and the New Modern Shipyard project under the Gwadar Port Authority has once again highlighted the complexities surrounding Gwadar’s development, sources revealed.

The Senate Standing Committee on Defence Production held a meeting under the chairmanship of Senator Muhammad Abdul Qadir. The agenda included briefings on the construction progress, land issues, and financial challenges of the Gwadar Shipyard. However, the meeting was held in-camera.

While speaking to Business Recorder, sources disclosed that the Balochistan government allocated 750 acres of land for the New Modern Shipyard Project in 2023. However, disagreements over technical feasibility, delays in construction, and financial issues have put the ambitious project in jeopardy.

The New Modern Shipyard was envisioned as a transformative project for Gwadar, aimed at manufacturing ships and providing technical and mechanical support for the maritime industry.

Sources revealed that the Balochistan government allocated 750 acres in Mozah Kapar, a location that was deemed technically unfeasible for establishing a state-of-the-art shipbuilding facility, as it is situated 60 km away from the sea.

Moreover the sources maintained that according to the technical team, the proposed shipyard’s strategic location is in Mozah Surband, which is 24 km away from the sea. This location was chosen due to its proximity to the deep-sea port and zero-height seabed, allowing large vessels to dock and be constructed efficiently.

The Gwadar Port Authority has raised concerns over the legitimacy of the land allocation, arguing that the project does not fully align with the region’s Gwadar Master Plan 2050.

Sources further stated that global shipbuilding principles emphasize the need for seamless integration between ports and shipyards, which critics argue is lacking in the current plan.

In 2017, China Communications Construction Company Limited and Fourth Harbour Engineering conducted an investigation for the development of the Gwadar Master Plan, which was completed in 2018 and submitted to the federal government for approval.

The total cost of the master plan was Rs. 521 million, out of which Rs. 425 million was provided as Chinese aid, while the Government of Pakistan contributed Rs. 91 million. This master plan is set to be completed by 2050 and is referred to as the Gwadar Smart City Master Plan. Under this plan, the Gwadar Shipyard is one of the key projects, for which the Government of Balochistan allocated land.

Senator Mohammad Abdul Qadir, in a post on X, stated that the Gwadar Shipyard mega project is not just for Balochistan but an important part of Pakistan’s development.

He emphasized that Pakistan is working rapidly on major projects, and removing the shipyard from national control would be detrimental.

Highlighting Gwadar’s significance, he stressed that the deep-sea port is an ideal location for shipbuilding. A central shipyard in Gwadar would facilitate the manufacturing of large ships and pave the way for additional shipyards in other regions.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

Comments are closed.