AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 35.1 (0.28%)
BR30 39,387 Increased By 124.3 (0.32%)
KSE100 117,807 Increased By 34.4 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,347 Increased By 50.4 (0.14%)

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) discovering huge revenue loss of Rs9.8 billion, passed the order for charging 18 percent sales tax from solar net metering electricity consumers across the country.

The same is the position with respect to Withholding of Income Tax under section 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance.

In this regard, the FTO has issued instructions to the power distribution companies and FBR’s field formations for immediate implementation here on Monday.

‘Fake’ imports of solar panel: PCA unearths Rs106bn money laundering

The FTO has also declared that the sales tax will be charged @ 18% on a taxable supply made by the DISCOs and there is no concept of net metering (net of the KWh supplied by the consumers having solar panels against the KWh supplied by the DISCOs) under provisions of the Sales Tax Act.

The FTO has referred to the FBR’s instructions that the sales tax is required to be charged on the value of supply and not the net off value.

Therefore, it is clarified that all DISCOS including K-Electric are required to charge Sales Tax on the gross amount of value of electricity supplied to the consumers without having any effect of net metering.

The same is the position with respect to Withholding of Income Tax under Section 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. It is required to be withheld on the gross amount without having any effect of net metering, the FBR added.

The FTO order stated that National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) is the authority related to the determination of tariffs on the supply of electric power and does not have any authority to charge sales tax or income tax.

Therefore, any SRO issued by the Nepra and guidelines issued by the AEDB on the issue of changeability of tax cannot override the provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1990 or Income Tax Ordinance 2001 which are fiscal laws/special laws and bear overriding effect to general law or any other regulations like Nepra or AEDB guidelines already settled by Supreme Court of Pakistan, the FTO maintained.

The instructions/direction of the FBR are binding and all tax authorities employed in the execution of this Ordinance/Act shall observe and follow the orders, instructions, and directions issued by the Board in terms of section 72 of the Act and 214 of the Ordinance.

Thus it can be established without any doubt that K-Electric has been charging sales tax and income tax on electricity bills as per legally correct provisions of the law. On the contrary, all other eleven DISCOs are not following the legally correct provisions of the law while collecting sales tax and income tax from the electricity consumers.

The complaint has been filed in terms of section 10(1) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 (FTO Ordinance) against the alleged illegal charging of sales tax on the gross amount of value of electricity supplied to the consumer without considering the concept of net metering in violation of NEPRA SRO 892(1)12015 dated 01.09.2015 and “Net-Metering Reference Guide for the DISCOs” issued by the Alternative Energy Development Board (AEDB) causing undue financial burden and resulting discriminatory treatment when it was being charged on net metering basis by other DISCOs against electric consumers all over Pakistan.

Briefly, the complainant is an electric consumer of K-Electric; one of Pakistan’s twelve distribution companies (DISCOs). The complainant installed solar panels in terms of the framework prescribed by Nepra for regulation of Distributed Generation by using alternative and renewable energy and net metering under SR0892(l)/201 5 dated 01.09.2015.

The FBR will direct the concerned Commissioners-IR having jurisdiction over the following DISCOs to enforce legal provisions of law strictly related to tax treatment on net metering as clarified by Board immediately:

Faisalabad Electric Supply Company (FESCO), Gujranwala Electric Power Company (GEPCO), Hazara Electric Supply Company (HAZECO), Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (HESCO), Islamabad Electric Supply Company (IESCO), Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO), Multan Electric Power Company (MEPCO), Peshawar Electric Power Company (PESCO), Quetta Electric Supply Company (QESCO), Sukkur Electric Power Company (SEPCO) and Tribal Electric Supply Company (TESCO).

The FTO should initiate an inquiry over the huge loss of govt revenue in billions every year, the order added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

200 characters
KU Feb 25, 2025 09:21am
Not surreal at all. If you don't succeed in discouraging renewable energy first time, try try again. After all, IPPs must be protected n no inquiry shall be undertaken on their agreements.
thumb_up Recommended (6) reply Reply
Farjad Ahmed Feb 25, 2025 12:40pm
FTO's orders are in line with the law of the land. The government should have themselves done it . Yes GST overall rates are again government 's preoperative
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Aam Aadmi Feb 25, 2025 02:26pm
How can a common, illiterate person understand the meaning of this all? BR, please add one or two sentences of your own summarising in the simplest possible terms the implications of anu such ruling.
thumb_up Recommended (15) reply Reply
Ihsan Feb 25, 2025 03:58pm
Just search for money from masses. And carry on with bad governance
thumb_up Recommended (4) reply Reply
Zia Ul Islam Feb 25, 2025 06:02pm
Very appropriate decision. I hope FBR and DISCOs would be swift in implementation of FTOs direction.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Taimoor Khan Feb 25, 2025 06:15pm
Thugs just wanna loot.
thumb_up Recommended (4) reply Reply
Obaid Feb 25, 2025 06:59pm
In my opinion such issues are beyond the legal scope of FTO.This is a real irony of our society that every institution wants to govern the country by over stretching it's legal jurisdiction.
thumb_up Recommended (4) reply Reply
Sofia Noreen Feb 25, 2025 07:17pm
No idea at all what is thus news article means: what a crappy way to provide information.
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Anwar-ul Haq Feb 25, 2025 09:27pm
@Obaid , yes.
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
Anwar-ul Haq Feb 25, 2025 09:30pm
It looks FTO has started to exercise its authority to relieve the Govt. Whatever he can do, Pakistan will not run in this way.
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Nawab Ali Shah Feb 25, 2025 10:18pm
What does it mean for a person who has installed a solar system with net metering?
thumb_up Recommended (7) reply Reply
M. Saeed Feb 26, 2025 01:13am
Why double standards? If consumers are charged GST for electric power supply, then why the solar power generating and. exporting to discos consumers, are not paid the GST like wise, by Discos???
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
M. Saeed Feb 26, 2025 01:26am
@Nawab Ali Shah , It simply means, if you are saving something by producing solar energy, you should doule pay the tax and GST on it. Just like, if you drill a borehole for water, still you pay.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
QAMAR ABBASI Feb 26, 2025 07:34am
All Govt officials are increasing their salaries many times with free utilities. And penalizing common citizens who made investment on solar panels from their own savings. Total injustice.
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
Mr. Nasir Gulzar Feb 26, 2025 12:35pm
hello
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
A Feb 26, 2025 03:25pm
Will DISCOs now recover this amount in future bills ?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
M. Saeed Feb 26, 2025 04:26pm
Jugga tax promoter FTO!
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Syed Farrukh Hussain Feb 26, 2025 06:53pm
Reward the Guilty and Punish the Innocent
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
Qaiser Feb 26, 2025 08:26pm
On solar system at household level government not invested single ruppee.For net metering they charged the consumer more than 1 lac. Where as peak hours company charge Rs 50 per unit.they getting fre.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Tariq Qurashi Feb 27, 2025 10:36am
Sabotage the development of cheap, renewable, pollution free energy that saves precious foreign exchange; and which is installed at no cost to the government. Penny wise and pound foolish.
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
Tariq Mahmoood Mar 05, 2025 11:27pm
The implications of this are very serious for the consumers. No one will now instal solar system. Power companies will now rejoice.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
NB Mar 06, 2025 04:59am
In other word they wouldn't be doing any action against IPPs who they over charging, they are just protecting themselves and shifting all things on public
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply