AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 35.1 (0.28%)
BR30 39,387 Increased By 124.3 (0.32%)
KSE100 117,807 Increased By 34.4 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,347 Increased By 50.4 (0.14%)

Pakistan’s recent Champions Trophy loss to India was not merely a defeat. The clash starkly highlighted how far the country has fallen behind its arch-rival.

The match, marked by a dismal and uncompetitive performance, serves as a powerful emblem of the pervasive decline in Pakistani cricket. This is not an isolated incident – it’s part of a long-standing pattern.

Once fierce competitors, Pakistan now struggles to present any challenge to India, both on and off the field. The decline of cricket isn’t just a sporting failure. It mirrors the country’s broader struggles with economics, governance and global standing.

Like the country itself, Pakistan’s cricket team has become an underwhelming brand that fails to deliver on its promises. The lack of substantial reforms, the politicization of the sport and mismanagement by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) have all played a significant role in this decline.

Following $600mn Ambani wedding, India has set the stage for its next growth phase, Pakistan is still lost

While India aggressively invests in infrastructure, talent development, and professional management, Pakistan’s cricket remains ensnared in a cycle of nepotism, ad-hoc decisions and empty rhetoric.

The contrast between the two nations is glaring and unacceptable. India’s cricket board, the BCCI, stands as the richest in the world, backed by a robust domestic league (the IPL) that not only attracts global talent but also generates billions in revenue.

Pakistan’s PSL, though a step in the right direction, is simply insufficient by comparison. India’s cricketing success is rooted not just in financial might but in vision, strategic planning and effective execution, qualities that Pakistan desperately lacks.

The divergence between India and Pakistan surpasses cricket.

Over the years, India has solidified its position as a global powerhouse, with a wealthy economy, a formidable diplomatic presence, and increasing influence in international arenas. Backed by reforms, India’s GDP has soared in recent years, while Pakistan grapples with crippling debt, inflation, and political chaos.

India’s ascent is also evident in its global branding and diplomatic initiatives as well.

From recently hosting the G20 summit to spearheading initiatives on climate change and technology, India is now projecting itself as a leading voice for the Global South. Its strategic efforts, such as trying to secure a permanent seat on the UN Security Council, reflects a nation with a clear and ambitious vision for its global role.

In stark contrast, Pakistan’s foreign policy has been reactive and inconsistent, perpetually overshadowed by internal crises and a lack of direction.

Not long ago, the gap between India and Pakistan was not as wide. Both nations faced similar challenges, and their cricketing rivalry was fierce and evenly matched.

However, India has surged ahead, while Pakistan has declined.

Pakistan bemoans ‘death of cricket’ after Champions Trophy flop

This difference is not solely economic or diplomatic. It’s cultural and psychological. India’s rise has imparted pride and confidence in its citizens, while Pakistan’s decline has increasingly become the reason of frustration and disillusionment.

Cricket serves as a reflection of this broader trend, highlighting the stark differences between the two countries. India’s cricketing success seems to be grounded in professionalism, innovation and ambition.

In contrast, Pakistan continues to rely on raw talent without the necessary systems, vision and sacrifices to nurture it. As a result, the team shines only occasionally while consistently failing to deliver on the big stage.

If Pakistan is to compete with India – whether in cricket or any other domain – it must implement serious and immediate reforms.

This entails overhauling the PCB, investing in grassroots development, and establishing a system that prioritizes merit over connections. Moreover, the PSL must be expanded and marketed globally to attract the necessary investment and talent.

Beyond cricket, Pakistan must confront its systemic issues, including corruption, political instability and economic mismanagement. Pakistan’s recent defeat to India is more than a sporting loss. It’s an urgent wake-up call.

The decline of cricket is a reflection of the country’s broader struggles, from economic stagnation to diplomatic irrelevance.

To compete with India – whether on the cricket pitch or the global stage – Pakistan needs more than just talent.

It is India’s time on the global stage; Pakistan is nowhere near it

It requires a fundamental shift in its mindset and approach. The country must wholeheartedly embrace reform, innovation, and accountability to reclaim its rightful place on the world stage.

Without decisive action, the gap between these two nations will only continue to widen, leaving Pakistan hidden in the shadows of its once-equal rival.

Umair Jamal

The writer is Head of the Political Desk at Business Recorder (Digital)

Comments

200 characters
KU Feb 25, 2025 07:01pm
True. Lagging behind not just India, but the world. Merit n democratic norms do not exist in our country, which is why they lie on issues regarding economy, law, justice, we cannot survive deception.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
hamza khan Feb 28, 2025 07:19am
from cricket to politics- pakistan needs someone like imran khan
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Abbas Ali Mar 03, 2025 12:28pm
@hamza khan, definitely not.
thumb_up Recommended (8) reply Reply