AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
AIRLINK 173.68 Decreased By ▼ -2.21 (-1.26%)
BOP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.46%)
CNERGY 8.26 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (3.25%)
FCCL 46.41 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (0.63%)
FFL 16.14 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
FLYNG 27.80 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (1.39%)
HUBC 146.32 Increased By ▲ 2.36 (1.64%)
HUMNL 13.40 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.37%)
KEL 4.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.44%)
KOSM 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.84%)
MLCF 59.66 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.27%)
OGDC 232.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.01%)
PACE 5.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.36%)
PAEL 47.98 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.05%)
PIAHCLA 17.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.22%)
PIBTL 10.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.7%)
POWER 11.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.53%)
PPL 191.48 Decreased By ▼ -1.82 (-0.94%)
PRL 36.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-0.46%)
PTC 23.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.4%)
SEARL 98.76 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-1.11%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 36.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.53%)
SYM 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.67%)
TELE 7.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
TPLP 10.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.1%)
TRG 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (1.34%)
WAVESAPP 10.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.82%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.49%)
YOUW 3.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.52%)
BR100 12,644 Increased By 35.1 (0.28%)
BR30 39,387 Increased By 124.3 (0.32%)
KSE100 117,807 Increased By 34.4 (0.03%)
KSE30 36,347 Increased By 50.4 (0.14%)

In a key development on the renewable energy front, the Federal Tax Ombudsman (FTO) ordered that solar net metering consumers in Pakistan pay an 18% sales tax.

The decision was made after discovering a significant revenue loss of approximately Rs9.8 billion, as reported by Business Recorder on Tuesday.

Under the ruling, the sales tax will be applied to the total amount of electricity supplied by power distribution companies (DISCOs), without considering the net metering arrangement.

This means that consumers will be taxed on the full amount of electricity they receive, not just the net amount after accounting for the power they generate and feed back into the grid, according to the report.

Similarly, income tax withholding under Section 235 of the Income Tax Ordinance will also be calculated on the gross amount of electricity supplied, not the net metered value.

Energy sector experts, including Dr Khalid Waleed, a research fellow at the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SPDI) weighed in on the decision.

“Rules suggest that sales tax should be charged from total energy supplied or gross consumption. This means that the net meters are liable to pay more taxes, which would discourage net metering,” Dr Khalid told Business Recorder.

The energy expert said the government faces a dilemma as it seeks to discourage net metering to boost grid demand.

“Net metering could be used as an effective tool, one way to optimize is to bring in more residential consumers towards net metering while using industrial consumers to bridge the national grid’s demand gap,” he said.

Asad Ali, a research analyst covering the energy chain at Insight Securities, described the decision as ‘negative’ for consumers, as it would likely lead to higher electricity costs. However, he noted that it was neutral for DISCOs, as it falls under sales tax.

The analyst noted that although the government remains committed to raising solar energy, the country’s energy system remains burdened by capacity payment issues.

“There has been a significant increase in net metering in Pakistan. However, the country’s energy system remains entrapped in capacity payment issues.

“The rapid growth in net metering challenges the government’s objective of selling more electricity from the grid,” said Ali.

In recent years, solar energy has made rapid strides in Pakistan with an estimated 22 gigawatts of solar panels imported in 2024 alone, making the country one of the most promising solar markets in the region.

Addressing the audience at Karachi Literature Festival (KLF) earlier this month, senator and climate advocate Sherry Rehman lauded the “solar revolution” currently underway in Pakistan, citing how “an enabling policy known as net metering has driven this change.”

“In just one year we have built one-third of our capacity by importing panels from China,” she said, adding how there is no reason why Pakistan cannot meet their climate goals by 2060.

On the other hand, Samiullah Tariq, Head of Research at Pakistan Kuwait Investment Company (Private) Limited, that the latest tax decision would not significantly impact solar consumers.

“We were already paying GST on the gross units rather than net units in Karachi, so the imposition of GST will not deter those looking to set up solar systems,” he told Business Recorder.

Similar sentiments were echoed by Tahir Abbas, Head of Equities at Arif Habib Limited (AHL). He said that the pace of solarization in Pakistan would continue, as the electricity rate remains “too high in the country”.

“However, if the government reduces tariffs, it could slow solar adoption as consumers will remain reliant on the national grid,” he said.

Comments

200 characters
Robin Mitha Feb 26, 2025 04:12pm
With a continuous steep decline in lithium battery prices this will only encourage consumers to go compleyely off grid and rely on their own system by installing batteries
thumb_up Recommended (15) reply Reply
A Feb 26, 2025 06:55pm
K-Electric customers have been paying this 18% since the beginning. It did not slow down anything. Here is your answer.
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Humayun Feb 27, 2025 01:34am
This can backfire as this will lead to people installing either additional solar plates to cover Taxes or go offgrid by installing battery backup.
thumb_up Recommended (6) reply Reply
Kashif ALI Feb 27, 2025 03:21am
A great move to impose 18% GST on solar users as more revenue would be generated. It should not slow down the solarization of domestic users. Batteries are still far away in our backward country.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
AN Feb 28, 2025 11:04am
Imposed one are using innovative ways to further suppress the masses
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Khawar Feb 28, 2025 11:34pm
@Humayun, they will levy another tax, on off-grid.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Ruman Shahid Mar 02, 2025 07:50pm
whole textile industry is already off the grid, now these stupids will force domestic consumers to get off the grid as they're one step away from it if lithium batteries will hit with competitive rate
thumb_up Recommended (2) reply Reply
Angry Guy Mar 03, 2025 04:30pm
Why is there an income tax and sales tax on electricity bill. I am not generating any income from my electricity .So why should I pay income tax? And if Im paying income tax ,why is there a sales tax
thumb_up Recommended (5) reply Reply