AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
BR100 12,327 Increased By 71.3 (0.58%)
BR30 36,803 Increased By 80.1 (0.22%)
KSE100 115,469 Increased By 449.5 (0.39%)
KSE30 35,563 Increased By 234.3 (0.66%)

EDITORIAL: Pakistan’s war against terrorism is far from over. The latest Global Terrorism Index (GTI) ranking, which places Pakistan as the second most terrorism-affected country in the world, is not just a statistic — it is a grim reflection of a grimmer reality. The brazen attack in Bannu, where at least 18 people, including five security personnel, were killed, is just the latest incident to underscore the severity of the threat.

The resurgence of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) is at the heart of this crisis. Ever since the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan, TTP has found a safe haven across the border, allowing it to regroup, reorganise, and launch deadly attacks inside Pakistan.

The Afghan Taliban’s repeated assurances that they would not let Afghan soil be used against any country have proven hollow. Instead of neutralising the TTP threat, the Taliban regime has emboldened them by refusing to act, if not outright facilitating their resurgence.

Pakistan’s attempts at diplomacy — whether in the form of talks with the Afghan government or previous peace negotiations with TTP — have failed miserably. The idea that the TTP could be politically engaged has long been thoroughly discredited.

Pakistan’s security forces have been waging relentless operations against militants, yet the frequency and scale of attacks suggest that a more forceful approach is now necessary.

The attacks are no longer just sporadic; they represent a systematic challenge to the state’s authority. KP and Balochistan have become hotbeds of insurgency, where terrorists routinely target military and police personnel.

The situation is eerily reminiscent of the dark days of the early 2010s, when Pakistan was engulfed in an all-out war against militant outfits. The difference now is that the enemy is operating from across the border, using Afghanistan as a springboard for its terrorist activities.

There is no more room for half-measures. Pakistan must shift to an aggressive counter-terrorism posture that eliminates the TTP threat once and for all. This means a coordinated military and intelligence-driven strategy, including decisive action against terror sanctuaries within and outside the country.

The state must not hesitate to exert diplomatic and strategic pressure on the Afghan Taliban. If Kabul refuses to rein in the TTP, Pakistan must consider all available options, however severe they may be, to protect and defend the homeland.

Beyond military action, there is also an urgent need for domestic security and intelligence reforms. The fact that terrorists are still able to breach security perimeters and carry out high-casualty attacks raises serious questions about intelligence failures.

The National Action Plan (NAP), once hailed as Pakistan’s roadmap to eradicating terrorism, has regrettably been reduced to a mere piece of paper. It must be revitalised and fully implemented, particularly in terms of dismantling militant networks, controlling extremist financing, and cracking down on radicalisation.

The economic implications of unchecked terrorism are equally dire. No investor — foreign or local — wants to do business in an unstable, violence-ridden country. At a time when Pakistan is already facing an economic crisis, rising militancy is the last thing it can afford.

Political instability only makes matters worse, as security strategies require policy continuity and state cohesion, both of which are lacking in Pakistan’s current fractured political climate. A weak political setup will always be an easy target for terrorists.

The state has spent two decades fighting terrorism, yet the resurgence of militancy proves that complacency is not an option. Pakistan must take control of the narrative, stop playing defence, and move decisively against the enemies of peace. If Afghanistan refuses to cooperate in dismantling terror sanctuaries, Pakistan must make it clear that it will act in its own security interests, with or without Kabul’s support.

The country has already suffered too much at the hands of terrorism. The time for half-measures, failed negotiations, and political hesitation is over. This fight must be won — fully, forcefully, and finally.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

200 characters
Yaqoot Mir Mar 16, 2025 08:34pm
A Global terror list needs to be tabulated based on the entity and country perpetrating the terrorism, they won’t have the guts to create a list like that because it will include INDIA AND ISRAEL
thumb_up Recommended (3) reply Reply