AIRLINK 167.80 Decreased By ▼ -10.36 (-5.81%)
BOP 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.59%)
CNERGY 7.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.8%)
CPHL 88.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.50 (-4.86%)
FCCL 44.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-3.87%)
FFL 15.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.14%)
FLYNG 28.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.58%)
HUBC 138.25 Decreased By ▼ -3.86 (-2.72%)
HUMNL 12.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.73%)
KEL 4.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2.06%)
KOSM 5.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-5.57%)
MLCF 64.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-2.25%)
OGDC 212.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.33 (-1.09%)
PACE 5.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.65%)
PAEL 45.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.96%)
PIAHCLA 17.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.83%)
PIBTL 9.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-5.12%)
POWER 14.50 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.11%)
PPL 167.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.82 (-1.66%)
PRL 30.63 Decreased By ▼ -2.55 (-7.69%)
PTC 21.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.44%)
SEARL 90.21 Decreased By ▼ -3.19 (-3.42%)
SSGC 41.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
SYM 14.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-6.02%)
TELE 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.26%)
TPLP 9.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.76%)
TRG 65.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.70 (-2.54%)
WAVESAPP 9.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.34%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
YOUW 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.62%)
AIRLINK 167.80 Decreased By ▼ -10.36 (-5.81%)
BOP 9.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-2.59%)
CNERGY 7.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.8%)
CPHL 88.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.50 (-4.86%)
FCCL 44.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.77 (-3.87%)
FFL 15.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.14%)
FLYNG 28.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.58%)
HUBC 138.25 Decreased By ▼ -3.86 (-2.72%)
HUMNL 12.46 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.73%)
KEL 4.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-2.06%)
KOSM 5.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-5.57%)
MLCF 64.80 Decreased By ▼ -1.49 (-2.25%)
OGDC 212.03 Decreased By ▼ -2.33 (-1.09%)
PACE 5.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.65%)
PAEL 45.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-1.96%)
PIAHCLA 17.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-1.83%)
PIBTL 9.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-5.12%)
POWER 14.50 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.11%)
PPL 167.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.82 (-1.66%)
PRL 30.63 Decreased By ▼ -2.55 (-7.69%)
PTC 21.24 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-1.44%)
SEARL 90.21 Decreased By ▼ -3.19 (-3.42%)
SSGC 41.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
SYM 14.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-6.02%)
TELE 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.26%)
TPLP 9.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-3.76%)
TRG 65.28 Decreased By ▼ -1.70 (-2.54%)
WAVESAPP 9.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.34%)
WTL 1.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.75%)
YOUW 3.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.62%)
BR100 12,255 Decreased By -261.8 (-2.09%)
BR30 36,723 Decreased By -919.8 (-2.44%)
KSE100 115,020 Decreased By -2206.3 (-1.88%)
KSE30 35,328 Decreased By -691.3 (-1.92%)

Repeat after me: in an industry where producers engage only in opportunistic exports — and where the domestic market is walled off from serious import or substitute threats — the outcome of exports will always, without exception, be an increase in local prices.

Case in point: in the eight months since June 2024, Pakistan’s sugar industry exported nearly 0.8 million metric tons (12 percent of last year’s output). The result? A 20 percent rise in domestic sugar prices compared to the period when exports were banned. Not because local prices suddenly aligned with international parity. Not due to a supply shortage. But because exports served their intended purpose: they relieved downward pressure on local prices in a market that otherwise had a surplus.

The industry wasn’t coy about it either. When mills demanded export permission last year, they warned that without exports, carryover stocks would balloon, forcing mills to delay crushing and leaving farmers holding the bag. Now that the purpose has been served and domestic prices have risen, export demand has evaporated — just 2,000 tons exported in February 2025 compared to an average of 100,000 tons per month between June and January.

This isn’t rocket science, and the government must resist knee-jerk reactions. The sugar industry is no helpless victim; it saw this coming. Cane availability is tight, and refined sugar output for the Nov 2024–Jan 2025 period is the lowest in six years. But that’s no reason to panic. Left alone, the market will self-correct after peak demand in Ramazan and Eid. If price pressures persist beyond Eid, importers will step in. Even a 0.3 MMT import consignment would be enough to send a strong signal to hoarders and speculators.

Yes, a 31 percent increase in retail sugar prices since November 2023 is painful for consumers and small businesses. But before we wail, consider what we’ve avoided. As of March 2025, retail sugar prices are only 4 percent higher than their last peak in September 2023 — 19 months ago. Between Q3-2023 and Q4-2024, sugar prices were in secular decline. That’s confirmed by banking data: sugar mill financing dropped by only 36 percent between March and November 2024, against a historical average of 55 percent.

What does that tell you? Prices were falling even as other commodities surged, demand had collapsed, and mills were suffocating under old bank debts. If exports weren’t allowed, mills would have refused to crush. Farmers, already burnt by the wheat debacle, would have taken another hit. And all this during a season with a short cane supply. Imagine the chaos: mill shutdowns, angry farmers, shortages in urban markets — and let’s not forget, politically embarrassing headlines when the families of the sitting President and Prime Minister are reportedly mill owners themselves.

Could the industry have restrained its instincts? Sure. But animal spirits don’t change overnight. And thank God they didn’t, because farmers finally got a fair price for cane.

This is not the time for price controls, nor for banning exports or imports. Ramzan shocks are inevitable growing pains. Let them play out. Price signals are functioning. Sugar is not essential for survival, not for the poorest. Let prices rise to the point where imports correct the market. Don’t confuse participants by imposing artificial price caps now.

Long term, the industry will only learn discipline once it faces competition from real substitutes and loses its information asymmetry advantage. Pakistan has (finally!) taken steps toward deregulation. Don’t snap back.

Comments

200 characters
KU Mar 21, 2025 11:16am
Proves again n again the power of cartels in our economy. The truth ''this is the best place to live/profit from, if you have the right contacts n support''. And we profess economic sustainability?
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Az_Iz Mar 21, 2025 04:49pm
Very correct. Sugar prices need not be regulated. When exports increase, prices increase, which makes exports non-competitive. Let market forces come into play.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Amin Jibril Mar 22, 2025 08:18am
Yes, but cartel must be broken.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Taha Abbasi Mar 22, 2025 03:14pm
100% Agreed on this! If exports are open then imports should be opened to provide a balance throughout the year.
thumb_up Recommended (1) reply Reply
Az_Iz Mar 23, 2025 07:39pm
Completely agree.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply