AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
BR100 12,327 Increased By 71.3 (0.58%)
BR30 36,803 Increased By 80.1 (0.22%)
KSE100 115,469 Increased By 449.5 (0.39%)
KSE30 35,563 Increased By 234.3 (0.66%)

The Sindh High Court has temporarily suspended a controversial water allocation certificate issued by the Indus River System Authority (IRSA), citing irregularities in the authority’s composition and potential violations of provincial water rights.

The Sindh High Court on Monday raised serious questions about the legality of the IRSA current structure and suspended its January 25 water allocation certificate that authorized water transfers to Cholistan through link canals.

IAC approves water availability for April only

During the hearing of Constitutional Petition No. D-987 of 2025, a division bench led by Justice Aadil Arab observed that IRSA’s current composition appears to violate both the IRSA Act, 1992 and a 2000 Executive Order, as affirmed by the court’s 2013 judgment in C.P. No.D-5206/2013.

“Prima facie, the contention appears correct,” the court noted, pointing out that while the law requires the federal member of IRSA to be from Sindh, the current incumbent (Respondent No.5) is not from the province.

“Thus, the present structure of Respondent IRSA is under serious dispute.”

The court ordered all parties to maintain status quo, directing that “Respondents should not take any further action and measures in pursuance of the above Water Availability Certificate dated 25.01.2025.”

Punjab & Sindh: There will be massive water shortfall: Irsa

Advocate General Jawad Dero informed the court that the Sindh government has already invoked Article 155 of the Constitution, which provides a dispute resolution mechanism including appointment of expert commissions.

The water dispute centers on IRSA’s approval for transferring 0.8 million acre-feet (MAF) of water to Cholistan through link canals - a decision strongly opposed by Sindh which argues it violates provincial water rights and could exacerbate water shortages in the province.

Representing the petitioner, advocates Zameer Hussain Ghumro, Malik Naeem Iqbal and Faizan H. Memon argued that IRSA’s water certificate was issued by an “illegally constituted” authority.

They sought suspension of the certificate, which the court effectively granted through its restraining order.

The federal and provincial law officers, including Additional Attorney General Mohsin Qadir Shahwani, sought time to file para-wise comments.

The court granted 10 days for submission of documents, with advance copies to be provided to petitioner’s counsel.

Sajid Ali Bhutto, Secretary of Sindh’s Irrigation Department, was also present during the hearing.

The court has adjourned proceedings until April 18, when it will examine whether IRSA’s composition complies with legal requirements and constitutional provisions protecting provincial water rights.

Comments

200 characters
KU Apr 07, 2025 08:48pm
Idea of canals for desert is madness when established/prospective good soil agri-lands exist in Sindh n Punjab, but do not have access to canal water. Dams/reservoirs is life-line against climate.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply