AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
AIRLINK 167.01 Decreased By ▼ -1.50 (-0.89%)
BOP 9.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
CNERGY 7.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.63%)
CPHL 88.70 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (0.83%)
FCCL 44.99 Increased By ▲ 1.06 (2.41%)
FFL 15.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.74%)
FLYNG 28.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.57%)
HUBC 140.20 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.62%)
HUMNL 12.56 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.54%)
KEL 4.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.47%)
KOSM 5.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.08%)
MLCF 67.40 Increased By ▲ 2.61 (4.03%)
OGDC 213.50 Increased By ▲ 1.81 (0.86%)
PACE 5.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.32%)
PAEL 44.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-1.27%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.24 (-1.4%)
PIBTL 9.36 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.41%)
POWER 14.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.97%)
PPL 163.99 Decreased By ▼ -2.41 (-1.45%)
PRL 29.29 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-4.44%)
PTC 21.51 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (1.46%)
SEARL 88.51 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-2.17%)
SSGC 40.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-1.34%)
SYM 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.14%)
TELE 7.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-2.98%)
TPLP 9.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-1.92%)
TRG 64.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1%)
WAVESAPP 9.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.95%)
WTL 1.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.53%)
YOUW 3.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.88%)
BR100 12,327 Increased By 71.3 (0.58%)
BR30 36,803 Increased By 80.1 (0.22%)
KSE100 115,469 Increased By 449.5 (0.39%)
KSE30 35,563 Increased By 234.3 (0.66%)

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) on Thursday strongly criticised the federal government’s controversial Cholistan canal project under the “Green Pakistan Initiative” – a move the party insisted could deprive Sindh of its lifeblood: water from the Indus River.

In a resolution submitted to the National Assembly Secretariat, the PTI denounced what it termed a blatant bid to legitimise Punjab’s alleged covert water appropriation. The party accused the government of sidelining constitutional norms and brushing aside Sindh’s urgent concerns.

The Leader of the Opposition in the National Assembly, Omar Ayub, along with PTI leaders Zartaj Gul, Ali Muhammad Khan, and other senior leaders, accused the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) of playing a “double game” – pretending to be Sindh’s saviour while turning a blind eye to a plan that could devastate the province’s agricultural heartland and fragile delta ecosystem.

Sharjeel reiterates party’s stance against canal project

The controversial Cholistan canal project, quietly cleared through Central Development Working Party (CDWP) last year in October, has come under sharp criticism for allegedly violating the Constitution.

In its resolution, the PTI denounced the move as a blatant breach of Articles 154 and 155 of the Constitution, calling for the immediate suspension of the project pending a formal review by the Council of Common Interests (CCI).

The PTI, demanding a meeting of CCI within 15 days, urged an immediate moratorium on all new canal projects on the Indus River, and demanded an independent audit of water availability figures provided by the Indus River System Authority (IRSA), which it accused of lacking neutrality.

At the centre of the dispute is the 1991 Water Apportionment Accord, which PTI claimed has been conveniently sidelined.

Under the agreement, Sindh is entitled to 48.76 million acre-feet of water annually, along with an additional 10 million acre-feet in environmental flows considered vital to prevent the Indus Delta from collapsing into an ecological disaster.

“This isn’t development. It’s plunder in the name of development, and the PPP is bent upon doing it,” alleged Zartaj Gul Wazir. “And the PPP, which claims to be the saviour of Sindh, is letting it happen right under its nose, which is shameful.”

The resolution called for greater transparency and to take on board Sindh’s civil society, elected representatives, and nationalist political parties in any future decision-making.

It demanded that public hearings be held and made accessible to all, warning against any more behind-the-scenes talks.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

200 characters