AIRLINK 155.38 Increased By ▲ 3.26 (2.14%)
BOP 9.69 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (6.25%)
CNERGY 7.11 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
CPHL 84.07 Increased By ▲ 1.78 (2.16%)
FCCL 43.44 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.47%)
FFL 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (4.08%)
FLYNG 30.31 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (6.02%)
HUBC 136.24 Increased By ▲ 4.30 (3.26%)
HUMNL 12.51 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.29%)
KEL 4.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
KOSM 5.02 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.24%)
MLCF 69.44 Increased By ▲ 2.39 (3.56%)
OGDC 203.25 Increased By ▲ 2.87 (1.43%)
PACE 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.4%)
PAEL 42.50 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.41%)
PIAHCLA 16.57 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.16%)
PIBTL 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (4.39%)
POWER 13.93 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (6.74%)
PPL 150.83 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.5%)
PRL 28.91 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (4.33%)
PTC 20.73 Increased By ▲ 1.27 (6.53%)
SEARL 84.04 Increased By ▲ 2.07 (2.53%)
SSGC 40.25 Increased By ▲ 2.98 (8%)
SYM 14.83 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (3.13%)
TELE 6.98 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.35%)
TPLP 8.27 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.6%)
TRG 64.05 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.46%)
WAVESAPP 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.59%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.6%)
YOUW 3.42 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (2.09%)
AIRLINK 155.38 Increased By ▲ 3.26 (2.14%)
BOP 9.69 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (6.25%)
CNERGY 7.11 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
CPHL 84.07 Increased By ▲ 1.78 (2.16%)
FCCL 43.44 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.47%)
FFL 14.79 Increased By ▲ 0.58 (4.08%)
FLYNG 30.31 Increased By ▲ 1.72 (6.02%)
HUBC 136.24 Increased By ▲ 4.30 (3.26%)
HUMNL 12.51 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (2.29%)
KEL 4.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.5%)
KOSM 5.02 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (2.24%)
MLCF 69.44 Increased By ▲ 2.39 (3.56%)
OGDC 203.25 Increased By ▲ 2.87 (1.43%)
PACE 5.06 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.4%)
PAEL 42.50 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.41%)
PIAHCLA 16.57 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (2.16%)
PIBTL 8.79 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (4.39%)
POWER 13.93 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (6.74%)
PPL 150.83 Increased By ▲ 2.23 (1.5%)
PRL 28.91 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (4.33%)
PTC 20.73 Increased By ▲ 1.27 (6.53%)
SEARL 84.04 Increased By ▲ 2.07 (2.53%)
SSGC 40.25 Increased By ▲ 2.98 (8%)
SYM 14.83 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (3.13%)
TELE 6.98 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.35%)
TPLP 8.27 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.6%)
TRG 64.05 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (1.46%)
WAVESAPP 8.57 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (6.59%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.6%)
YOUW 3.42 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (2.09%)
BR100 12,160 Increased By 383.7 (3.26%)
BR30 35,356 Increased By 946.7 (2.75%)
KSE100 114,114 Increased By 2787.4 (2.5%)
KSE30 34,917 Increased By 924.3 (2.72%)

KARACHI: The Pakistan Tea Association (PTA) has called for the immediate withdrawal of SRO 1735, claiming the regulation has caused Rs 40 billion reduction in Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) collections during the first nine months of the current fiscal year.

At a press conference held at the Federation of Pakistan Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FPCCI) headquarters, PTA Chairman Muhammad Altaf, accompanied by FPCCI Vice President Aman Paracha, stated that the government’s November 2024 imposition of Rs 1,200 per kg MRP has significantly damaged the tea sector.

“Tea imports have fallen by 17.5 percent due to misuse of tax exemptions granted to the FATA/PATA region,” Altaf said.

He noted that while annual tea consumption in Pakistan stands at approximately 300,000 tons, imports over the past nine months totaled just 154,000 tons, compared to 190,000 tons during the same period last year.

The PTA chairman accused customs authorities in Faisalabad and Sargodha of clearing tea consignments at artificially low values without consulting the International Tea Price (ITP).

He demanded that no consignments be cleared without PTA’s ITP recommendations and emphasized that PTA members currently paid around 70 percent in taxes.

“If the SRO 1735 is not withdrawn, PTA will have no option but to take the matter to court,” Altaf warned.

FPCCI Vice President Paracha supported the PTA’s stance, stating, “FATA/PATA import quota, dry port facilities, and re-export mechanisms are being misused in the tea sector.”

He called for eliminating all exemptions and implementing uniform taxation across the board.

Paracha highlighted that small tea traders are struggling to compete against unfair market practices and pointed out significant taxation disparities.

“Tea imported at 800-900 rupees per kilogram is being taxed at 1,200 rupees per kilogram,” he said, demanding the withdrawal of the Rs 1,200 per kilogram MRP, which will help reducing tea price by Rs 200-300 per kilogram.

The FPCCI vice president also argued that tea should be classified as a food item and raw material rather than a finished product, as it undergoes mixing, processing, and packaging.

He revealed that approximately 71,000 tons of tea had already been imported by exploiting various concessions and benefits.

“This injustice and oppression against tea importers must stop,” Paracha said.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Comments

200 characters
Public Citizen Apr 16, 2025 11:50am
It’s import trade price not international tea price I.T.P which is also a part of the misdeclarations as it does not reflect the actual transactional value and under declares by 20% or so,
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply
Public Citizen Apr 16, 2025 11:52am
Since the actual legal import also indulges in under declarations, someone has to ask of course, how is the balance payment being sent? Hawala is the magic word and this is in connivance with customs.
thumb_up Recommended (0) reply Reply