AIRLINK 152.12 Decreased By ▼ -8.16 (-5.09%)
BOP 9.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.8%)
CNERGY 7.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-9.22%)
CPHL 82.29 Decreased By ▼ -3.82 (-4.44%)
FCCL 42.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-2.1%)
FFL 14.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-5.01%)
FLYNG 28.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.35%)
HUBC 131.94 Decreased By ▼ -5.18 (-3.78%)
HUMNL 12.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.77%)
KEL 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.68%)
KOSM 4.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-6.3%)
MLCF 67.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.71%)
OGDC 200.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.43 (-3.58%)
PACE 4.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.29%)
PAEL 41.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.70 (-3.94%)
PIAHCLA 16.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-3.34%)
PIBTL 8.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-5.61%)
POWER 13.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-3.19%)
PPL 148.60 Decreased By ▼ -8.50 (-5.41%)
PRL 27.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-3.08%)
PTC 19.46 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-5.44%)
SEARL 81.97 Decreased By ▼ -2.62 (-3.1%)
SSGC 37.27 Decreased By ▼ -2.06 (-5.24%)
SYM 14.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-5.27%)
TELE 6.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.99%)
TPLP 8.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-7.71%)
TRG 63.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.11%)
WAVESAPP 8.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-9.36%)
WTL 1.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
YOUW 3.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-5.37%)
AIRLINK 152.12 Decreased By ▼ -8.16 (-5.09%)
BOP 9.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.36 (-3.8%)
CNERGY 7.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-9.22%)
CPHL 82.29 Decreased By ▼ -3.82 (-4.44%)
FCCL 42.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-2.1%)
FFL 14.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-5.01%)
FLYNG 28.59 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.35%)
HUBC 131.94 Decreased By ▼ -5.18 (-3.78%)
HUMNL 12.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.77%)
KEL 4.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.68%)
KOSM 4.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.33 (-6.3%)
MLCF 67.05 Decreased By ▼ -1.87 (-2.71%)
OGDC 200.38 Decreased By ▼ -7.43 (-3.58%)
PACE 4.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-3.29%)
PAEL 41.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.70 (-3.94%)
PIAHCLA 16.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-3.34%)
PIBTL 8.42 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-5.61%)
POWER 13.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-3.19%)
PPL 148.60 Decreased By ▼ -8.50 (-5.41%)
PRL 27.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.88 (-3.08%)
PTC 19.46 Decreased By ▼ -1.12 (-5.44%)
SEARL 81.97 Decreased By ▼ -2.62 (-3.1%)
SSGC 37.27 Decreased By ▼ -2.06 (-5.24%)
SYM 14.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-5.27%)
TELE 6.82 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.99%)
TPLP 8.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.68 (-7.71%)
TRG 63.13 Decreased By ▼ -0.71 (-1.11%)
WAVESAPP 8.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-9.36%)
WTL 1.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
YOUW 3.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-5.37%)
BR100 11,776 Decreased By -377.8 (-3.11%)
BR30 34,410 Decreased By -1457.9 (-4.06%)
KSE100 111,327 Decreased By -3545.6 (-3.09%)
KSE30 33,993 Decreased By -1274 (-3.61%)

Punjab’s policymakers have found themselves a shiny new toy: Electronic Warehouse Receipts. On paper, the EWR system is everything a modernizing state dreams of—market-based, tech-enabled, collateral-driven. The logic is compelling: let farmers store their grain in certified warehouses, use the receipts to borrow from banks, and wait to sell until prices recover. All while the government steps aside from procurement and claims it has “liberalized” the market.

But out here in the real world—where timing, liquidity, and working capital decide whether the next crop gets sown or not—the math simply does not work.

Let us start with what EWR does not do. It does not give farmers money when they actually need it: immediately after harvest, when the next cropping season begins. This is when farmers are scrambling to buy certified seed, fertilizer, and crop protection. It is also when they are least interested in playing warehouse games or timing the market like commodity traders.

Ask any grower in south Punjab or central districts cultivating ten to fifteen acres—often leased in part, credit-financed in full—what is needed in May. The answer is not a warehouse receipt. The answer is liquidity.

The average per acre cost of certified inputs for the next season stands at roughly Rs 30,000. Multiply that across ten acres and the result is three hundred thousand rupees in immediate cash need—just to stay in the game. Not to invest, not to expand. Just to plant.

But what does the state offer in return? A one-time cash transfer of Rs 27,000—per farmer. Not per acre. Per farmer. Whether one farms two acres or twenty. It is not even a drop in the bucket—it is an insult to the arithmetic.

If EWR is meant to replace state procurement as the liquidity engine of the rural economy, it is failing on day one. And that is not because the idea is flawed—it is because it has been dropped into a system that is not ready for it.

There are three brutal mismatches here.

First, the timing mismatch. EWR relies on storing wheat post-harvest and using it as collateral for loans. But that is too late. Farmers need liquidity before they can afford to wait. EWR helps those with surplus. It does not help those struggling to fund the next cycle.

Second, the price mismatch. The government, while preaching market deregulation, is actively offloading yesteryears’ grain stock into the market through food departments. That suppresses prices. So even if a farmer warehouses wheat and waits, what exactly is the expectation? A market signal that is being distorted from above?

Third, the scale mismatch. Most farmers in Punjab operate on five to twenty acres. That is a scale at which a Rs 27,000 cheque is not even enough to cover urea, let alone pricey hybrid seed or pesticides. Meanwhile, the EWR system is geared toward players who can wait, hedge, and afford to navigate formal credit channels. That is not the median farmer. It is the aggregator, the trader, the commission agent.

And here is the kicker: those traders—yes, the same vilified aarthi class policymakers want to cut out—actually have the liquidity and rural networks to make EWR work. Instead of co-opting them as partners, the state has excluded them. And in doing so, it has ensured that the reform is neither inclusive nor effective.

This is not market liberalization. This is financial displacement without a safety net. A warehouse receipt is only as good as the trust in the price it can fetch, and the credit it can unlock. In a system where price signals are manipulated and credit markets are illiquid, it becomes little more than a piece of paper.

The real tragedy here is not that the idea is bad—it is that it is being wasted. EWR can work. It can modernize trade. It can formalize transactions. But only if the sequencing is right. Only if farmers have the option to hold, not the burden to wait. And only if the state gets out of the business of micromanaging prices while pretending to liberalize them.

Punjab’s policymakers seem keen to showcase this transition as reform. But a reform that replaces one broken system with another ill-timed, half-baked substitute is not a step forward. It is a stumble in the dark.

EWR is not the villain. But the way it is being sold—and worse, implemented—risks turning it into yet another example of reform theater: high on optics, low on impact.

And come June, when fields should be green with the next crop, many growers may find their land idle—not because they lack will, but because they lacked working capital.

Liquidity cannot be sown with warehouse receipts. It must be financed. And at the moment, nobody is.

Comments

Comments are closed.

mudassir abbas Apr 23, 2025 08:48am
Forward market development under PMEX with contract is the way forward after EWR , Farmer could get price discovery ahead of sowing.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:03pm
The article raises concerns about the EWR regime without fully understanding its purpose.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:10pm
The article raises concerns about the EWR regime without fully understanding its purpose.
thumb_up Recommended (1)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:11pm
EWR system is designed to protect farmers from distress sale by allowing them to store their wheat, access bank financing 70% of crop value and sell at a time of their choosing when prices are better
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:11pm
The government is also providing storage subsidies to reduce the burden on farmers.
thumb_up Recommended (1)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:12pm
Instead of forcing immediate sales at low prices, the EWR regime gives farmers options, financial support, and flexibility. It is a tool for empowerment, not exploitation.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:12pm
Lastly, the article cites PKR 27,000 per ton as a benchmark wheat price, but offers no explanation for this figure.
thumb_up Recommended (1)
Syed Hamid Raza Apr 23, 2025 02:12pm
On what basis was it determined? Any serious policy discussion must be rooted in data, not arbitrary numbers.
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Babar Apr 24, 2025 08:47am
Need to integrate with forward commodity market by making arrangements for trading on exchange
thumb_up Recommended (0)
Imtiaz Hussain Apr 24, 2025 04:49pm
Well crafted showing the real side which is not as bright as proclaimed.
thumb_up Recommended (0)