AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 6.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 41.44 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 86.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 32.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 64.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.46 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 41.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 60.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 190.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 27.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 86.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TOMCL 35.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 53.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
UNITY 26.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,010 Increased By 126.5 (1.28%)
BR30 31,023 Increased By 422.5 (1.38%)
KSE100 94,192 Increased By 836.5 (0.9%)
KSE30 29,201 Increased By 270.2 (0.93%)

Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry advised A K Dogar, one of the lawyer for petitioner Dr Mubashar Hassan, to raise at a relevant forum objections to former President Pervez Musharraf's intent to contest elections in spite of violating the Constitution on 3rd November 2007.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed amendments to Dr Hassan's petition on the implementation of the court's judgement on conducting free, fair, and transparent general elections. Heading a three-member bench, the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry heard the constitutional petition of Dr Hassan against pre-poll rigging and application of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution in relation to qualification of candidates for national and provincial assemblies.
During the course of proceedings, the Chief Justice observed that the objective of the petition was to ensure implementation of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution, maintaining that the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) knew better how to apply both the Articles in letter and in spirit. He further remarked that directives had already been issued to the ECP to provide constitutional guarantee to voters' right to access candidates' data.
The Chief Justice categorically stated that the court could enact a law or issue a standard operating procedure (SOP) in the matter and added that the court was unaware of any voter's objection against any candidate. Azhar Siddique, one of the counsel for the petitioner, accused the ECP of concealing facts with respect to verification of degrees. The Chief Justice asked him to identify those who provided inaccurate information to the Commission so that the court could summon them for prosecution. The hearing of the case was adjourned for one week.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.