AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.04 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BOP 6.67 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 4.51 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DFML 41.44 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DGKC 86.85 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FCCL 32.28 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFBL 64.80 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUMNL 14.68 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KEL 5.05 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 7.46 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
MLCF 41.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
NBP 60.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
OGDC 190.10 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PAEL 27.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 150.06 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SEARL 86.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TELE 7.71 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TOMCL 35.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TPLP 8.12 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TREET 16.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
TRG 53.29 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
UNITY 26.16 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.26 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 9,987 Increased By 102.9 (1.04%)
BR30 31,139 Increased By 538.9 (1.76%)
KSE100 94,031 Increased By 675.4 (0.72%)
KSE30 29,133 Increased By 201.9 (0.7%)

The Lahore High Court on Wednesday issued notice to the secretary of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) and a law officer, asking them to submit replies on Thursday (today) in a petition challenging the new format of the nomination papers allegedly favouring former tax defaulters.
The petitioner, Muhammad Naveed Yaseen, through his counsel, Fahad Ahmed Siddiqi, submitted that the ECP realised certain mistakes in the nomination forms and made 16 changes in it. He said the contents of Serial No 3 (ii) of the Nomination Form-I and Declaration and Oath was contrary to the Constitution and should be declared illegal and unconstitutional.
He said by inserting Sub-Clause (ii) in Clause 3 of the nomination form, a deliberate attempt had been made to "fail the effects of Article 63 (1) (o) of the Constitution". He said the content of this clause given in the form "is directly in contradiction with the provisions of Article 63 (1)(o)". He, therefore, requested the court to declare the content of Serial No 3 (ii) of the Nomination Form-1 in direct contradiction with the provisions of Article 63(1) (o) of the Constitution.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.