Former Prime Ministers, others: CJP takes notice of security protocol, privileges

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry on Saturday, took notice of "unprecedented" security protocol to ex-prime ministers, unlimited perks and privileges for Rehman Malik and his predecessors, CM, Speaker and Deputy Speaker Sindh. The CJP directed the Attorney General for Pakistan, Advocate General and IGP Sindh to file their para-wise comments on April 16.
The CJ took notice on a note of Registrar based on press clippings of different newspapers containing the details that just one day before the end of the current National Assembly's term, Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf issued an order for an "unprecedented security protocol" for himself and former Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani.
It was stated that just hours before the constitutional tenure of Parliament came to an end, the Interior Ministry issued a notification on March 14 declaring unlimited perks and privileges for Rehman Malik, Federal Interior Minister and his predecessors. Moreover, the press clippings further mentioned that the Sindh Assembly on March 14, the last day of its tenure, passed two private bills moved by Pakistan People's Party legislators Ghulam Mujadid Isran and Dr Sikander Mandhro to grant lifetime monetary and other benefits to the outgoing Chief Minister, the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker.
The note of the Registrar further stated that the above-mentioned benefits/privileges sanctioned to former Prime Minister, Chief Ministers, Ministers, Speakers, Deputy Speakers and members of Provincial Assembly are unique and unprecedented. The sanction was accorded/legislation enacted at a peculiar time ie a day or two before the cabinets/assemblies concluded their term. It is questionable as to whether this kind of self-serving order/legislation is covered under the law/ Constitution.
The benefits/privileges bestowed would be a huge burden on the public exchequer. The security protocol would further deplete the strength of security agencies, who otherwise do not have adequate force to maintain peace/security and protect the rights/freedoms of citizens including the right to life, security, liberty and property, etc. The measures seem to be in violation of Articles 4, 9, 24 and 25 of the Constitution.