AGL 39.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-1.25%)
AIRLINK 128.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.97 (-0.75%)
BOP 6.82 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.04%)
CNERGY 4.69 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (4.45%)
DCL 8.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.29%)
DFML 41.39 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.4%)
DGKC 82.88 Increased By ▲ 1.92 (2.37%)
FCCL 32.95 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.55%)
FFBL 73.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-1.17%)
FFL 11.90 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.36%)
HUBC 110.80 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (1.11%)
HUMNL 14.67 Increased By ▲ 0.92 (6.69%)
KEL 5.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.69%)
KOSM 7.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.04%)
MLCF 38.95 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.91%)
NBP 64.05 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (0.85%)
OGDC 194.19 Decreased By ▼ -0.50 (-0.26%)
PAEL 25.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.27%)
PIBTL 7.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.14%)
PPL 154.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-0.51%)
PRL 25.86 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.27%)
PTC 17.97 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (2.69%)
SEARL 82.25 Increased By ▲ 3.60 (4.58%)
TELE 7.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.53%)
TOMCL 33.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.43 (-1.27%)
TPLP 8.54 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.67%)
TREET 16.55 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (1.72%)
TRG 56.90 Decreased By ▼ -1.32 (-2.27%)
UNITY 27.55 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.22%)
WTL 1.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-1.44%)
BR100 10,536 Increased By 90.5 (0.87%)
BR30 31,271 Increased By 81.8 (0.26%)
KSE100 98,406 Increased By 608.1 (0.62%)
KSE30 30,698 Increased By 217.7 (0.71%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday reserved its judgement in the passport lamination paper contract case. Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui was hearing a petition filed by M/s Reliance International & Co, a local representative of a French company M/s Hologram Industries, through his counsel Salman Akram Raja. The judgement was reserved after Justice Siddiqui was briefed in his chamber by a representative of a US-based firm which had been awarded the contract of provision of lamination paper.
The representative of the US-based firm also briefed Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui about the lamination's security features. Salman Akram Raja, the counsel of the petitioners, opposed the proceedings in the chamber, while the representative of Immigration and Passport (I&P) directorate favoured it.
The petitioner contended that the respondents had awarded the contract to their previous supplier in violation of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules. He also said that the contract had been awarded to the US firm at a lower rate. The petitioner has named the federation of Pakistan through the secretary of the Ministry of Interior, Director-General (DG) I&P, Project Director MRPs and Director Database/Secretary Committee, MRP project, DG I&P as respondents in the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.