AIRLINK 204.00 Increased By ▲ 3.10 (1.54%)
BOP 10.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.99%)
CNERGY 6.92 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.58%)
FCCL 34.85 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (2.23%)
FFL 17.28 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (1.77%)
FLYNG 24.61 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (2.37%)
HUBC 137.49 Increased By ▲ 5.79 (4.4%)
HUMNL 13.84 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.58%)
KEL 4.90 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.87%)
KOSM 6.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.3%)
MLCF 44.20 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (2.01%)
OGDC 221.70 Increased By ▲ 2.95 (1.35%)
PACE 7.07 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.29%)
PAEL 43.00 Increased By ▲ 1.46 (3.51%)
PIAHCLA 17.12 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.29%)
PIBTL 8.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.58%)
POWER 8.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.32%)
PPL 190.00 Increased By ▲ 2.88 (1.54%)
PRL 43.00 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (2.23%)
PTC 25.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.04%)
SEARL 106.20 Increased By ▲ 5.90 (5.88%)
SILK 1.02 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.99%)
SSGC 42.75 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (0.99%)
SYM 18.35 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (2.06%)
TELE 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.66%)
TPLP 13.18 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1.93%)
TRG 67.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-0.54%)
WAVESAPP 10.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.29%)
WTL 1.87 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.54%)
YOUW 4.15 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.48%)
BR100 12,137 Increased By 188.4 (1.58%)
BR30 37,146 Increased By 778.3 (2.14%)
KSE100 115,272 Increased By 1435.3 (1.26%)
KSE30 36,311 Increased By 549.3 (1.54%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday reserved its judgement in the passport lamination paper contract case. Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui was hearing a petition filed by M/s Reliance International & Co, a local representative of a French company M/s Hologram Industries, through his counsel Salman Akram Raja. The judgement was reserved after Justice Siddiqui was briefed in his chamber by a representative of a US-based firm which had been awarded the contract of provision of lamination paper.
The representative of the US-based firm also briefed Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui about the lamination's security features. Salman Akram Raja, the counsel of the petitioners, opposed the proceedings in the chamber, while the representative of Immigration and Passport (I&P) directorate favoured it.
The petitioner contended that the respondents had awarded the contract to their previous supplier in violation of Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) rules. He also said that the contract had been awarded to the US firm at a lower rate. The petitioner has named the federation of Pakistan through the secretary of the Ministry of Interior, Director-General (DG) I&P, Project Director MRPs and Director Database/Secretary Committee, MRP project, DG I&P as respondents in the case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2013

Comments

Comments are closed.