AGL 40.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.2%)
AIRLINK 127.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.27%)
BOP 6.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.49%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.77%)
DCL 8.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
DFML 41.40 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.75%)
DGKC 86.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.72%)
FCCL 32.13 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-3.77%)
FFBL 65.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
FFL 10.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.91%)
HUBC 110.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.03%)
HUMNL 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-3.92%)
KEL 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.41%)
KOSM 7.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3.77%)
MLCF 41.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.30 (-3.02%)
NBP 60.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.36%)
OGDC 194.48 Decreased By ▼ -3.16 (-1.6%)
PAEL 27.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-3.65%)
PIBTL 7.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3.39%)
PPL 150.52 Decreased By ▼ -3.64 (-2.36%)
PRL 27.08 Increased By ▲ 2.08 (8.32%)
PTC 16.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
SEARL 78.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.32%)
TELE 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.68%)
TOMCL 35.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.08%)
TPLP 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.11%)
TREET 15.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.56%)
TRG 52.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.24%)
UNITY 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 9,920 Decreased By -52.1 (-0.52%)
BR30 30,751 Decreased By -346.3 (-1.11%)
KSE100 93,225 Decreased By -423.8 (-0.45%)
KSE30 28,885 Decreased By -132.9 (-0.46%)

The Sindh High Court has restrained Sui Southern Gas Company Limited (SSGCL) and Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra) from levying and collecting Gas Infrastructure Development Cess (GIDC) in pursuance of a presidential ordinance.
In its order that it issued on September 29, 2014, the court said the counsel for the plaintiff, Dr Farogh Nasim, submits that originally the recovery of Gas Infrastructure Development Cess Act was challenged by virtue of filing a writ petition before the Peshawar High Court and consequently in terms of the judgement reported in 2013 PTD 1713 such recovery was held to be ultra vires, unreasonable being not based on reasonable differentia or fulfil corresponding responsibility and liability in a specified manner by the respondents. Such judgement was challenged before the Supreme Court which came up for hearing and ultimately the judgement of the Peshawar High Court was upheld and it was observed that GIDC is a fee and not a tax and in the alternate it is not covered by any entry relating to the imposition or levy of tax under Part-I of the Federal Legislative List. According to the court, the counsel submits that in order to undo such observation and judgements of the Peshawar High Court and Supreme Court, an Ordinance has been promulgated which is nothing but an act of invalidating the judgements. The counsel further submits that such can only be done by an act of Parliament by majority of 2/3rd and unless an amendment in Schedule-IV is made such recourse by promulgation of Ordinance cannot be held justified.
Issuing notices to respondents, Petroleum Ministry, SSGC and Ogra, the court, in the meantime, restrained SSGC and Ogra, from "raising such demand or issuing such bills in pursuance of the Ordinance No VI of 2014."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.