AIRLINK 191.54 Decreased By ▼ -21.28 (-10%)
BOP 10.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 6.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-4.43%)
FCCL 33.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.34%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-5.9%)
FLYNG 22.45 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.89%)
HUBC 126.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.51 (-1.94%)
HUMNL 13.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.22%)
KEL 4.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.44%)
KOSM 6.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-8.37%)
MLCF 42.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-3.51%)
OGDC 213.01 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.03%)
PACE 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.35%)
PAEL 40.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.11%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
PIBTL 8.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-4.4%)
POWER 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
PPL 182.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.08%)
PRL 38.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-3.86%)
PTC 23.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-3.36%)
SEARL 93.50 Decreased By ▼ -4.51 (-4.6%)
SILK 1.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.99%)
SSGC 39.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-4.51%)
SYM 18.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-2.23%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.78%)
TPLP 12.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.82%)
TRG 64.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-1.8%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.37%)
WTL 1.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.56%)
YOUW 3.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.74%)
BR100 11,697 Decreased By -168.8 (-1.42%)
BR30 35,252 Decreased By -445.3 (-1.25%)
KSE100 112,638 Decreased By -1510.2 (-1.32%)
KSE30 35,458 Decreased By -494 (-1.37%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has disposed of a complaint filed by Bi-axially Oriented Polypropylene ("BOPP") films manufacturer regarding grant of Pioneer Industry Status (PIS) by the Ministry of Industries and Production to manufacturers of Bi-axially Oriented Polyethylene Terephthalate ("BOPET") films. The CCP bench comprised Dr Joseph Wilson, Chairman, Dr Shahzad Ansar and Mueen Batlay who heard the case.
The complainant pleaded before the bench that BOPET films manufacturers do not qualify under the criteria laid down for the PIS, and they falsely claimed the pioneer status which has distorted competition in the relevant markets. It was alleged that the economic benefits of PIS granted to BOPET manufacturers has enabled them to abuse their dominant position in violation of Section 3 (1),(2) & (3)(f) of the Competition Act 2010 ("the Act"), ie, by charging predatory pricing and driving competition out of the market, preventing new entry and monopolising the market.
The Commission conducted a public hearing on September 4, 2014, wherein the Complainant and Respondents and representatives of Engineering Development Board submitted their views and comments on the matter. The assessment of abuse of dominance is dependent on the determination of relevant market which primarily comprises substitutable products in a particular geographic area. The products involved in the case were BOPP and BOPET film sheets produced in Pakistan.
Considering the characteristics, unique properties and suitability for their end usage, BOPP and BOPET film sheets are best used as complements of each other and are not substitutes. The Commission noted that since BOPP and BOPET do not form part of the same relevant market, therefore, the grant of PIS to BOPET manufacturers has not restricted, reduced or distorted competition in the market of BOPP.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.