AGL 40.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 127.20 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.13%)
BOP 6.63 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.6%)
CNERGY 4.54 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.67%)
DCL 8.56 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
DFML 41.72 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.68%)
DGKC 87.40 Increased By ▲ 0.55 (0.63%)
FCCL 32.51 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (0.71%)
FFBL 64.87 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.11%)
FFL 10.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
HUBC 109.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.01%)
HUMNL 14.74 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.41%)
KEL 5.11 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (1.19%)
KOSM 7.56 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.34%)
MLCF 41.55 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.41%)
NBP 59.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-1.34%)
OGDC 192.74 Increased By ▲ 2.64 (1.39%)
PAEL 28.15 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (1.15%)
PIBTL 7.83 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PPL 151.25 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (0.79%)
PRL 27.10 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.82%)
PTC 15.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-0.5%)
SEARL 86.02 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.02%)
TELE 7.78 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.91%)
TOMCL 35.53 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.34%)
TPLP 8.17 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.62%)
TREET 16.46 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.3%)
TRG 53.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.08%)
UNITY 26.30 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.54%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.59%)
BR100 9,989 Increased By 105.1 (1.06%)
BR30 31,165 Increased By 565.3 (1.85%)
KSE100 94,195 Increased By 839.9 (0.9%)
KSE30 29,187 Increased By 255.6 (0.88%)

A full bench of the Lahore High Court here on Wednesday asked Lahore Development Authority (LDA) to justify urgency being shown in construction of "Elevated Expressway" from Gulberg to Motorway II interchange on Thursday (today). The bench was hearing a number of petitions challenging construction of the expressway and process of land acquisition for Rs 27 billion project.
During the course of hearing, the counsel for LDA Salman Mansoor argued that the construction of the elevated expressway was a public welfare project. He said the project was a mandate of the executive and the court should not take judicial review of the matter. The counsel stated that affected people of the project had appropriate forums for legal remedy under Punjab Land Acquisition Act. He said cases relating to compensation against acquisition of land could be taken civil courts. The bench observed that apparently the government had no convincing ground for acquiring land on the pretext of urgency.
The bench, however, asked the counsel to apprise about the reasons for the construction of the expressway. The bench had been hearing arguments of lawyers representing the government, petitioners and amicus curie as well on the scope and nature of urgency required to invoke Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act.
The petitioners submitted that the government had imposed an emergency like situation and had been acquiring land under section 17 from general public by demolishing their homes to build the expressway. They submitted that the government, however, could not covey them the reasons behind this urgency. The petitioners, therefore, prayed to the court to set aside the project and acquisition of their land.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.