AIRLINK 196.50 Increased By ▲ 2.94 (1.52%)
BOP 10.25 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (3.02%)
CNERGY 7.88 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.63%)
FCCL 39.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.85 (-2.09%)
FFL 17.09 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (1.36%)
FLYNG 27.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-2.27%)
HUBC 133.95 Increased By ▲ 1.37 (1.03%)
HUMNL 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.51%)
KEL 4.78 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (3.91%)
KOSM 6.64 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.3%)
MLCF 47.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-0.88%)
OGDC 214.79 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (0.41%)
PACE 6.96 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.43%)
PAEL 42.00 Increased By ▲ 0.76 (1.84%)
PIAHCLA 17.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PIBTL 8.50 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.07%)
POWER 9.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.41%)
PPL 183.96 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (0.88%)
PRL 42.90 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (2.24%)
PTC 25.15 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (1%)
SEARL 109.80 Increased By ▲ 2.96 (2.77%)
SILK 1.00 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.01%)
SSGC 44.11 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (10%)
SYM 17.86 Increased By ▲ 0.39 (2.23%)
TELE 8.96 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.36%)
TPLP 13.06 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (2.43%)
TRG 67.60 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.97%)
WAVESAPP 11.68 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (3.09%)
WTL 1.83 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (2.23%)
YOUW 3.97 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-2.46%)
BR100 12,249 Increased By 204.5 (1.7%)
BR30 36,933 Increased By 352.6 (0.96%)
KSE100 115,663 Increased By 1625.1 (1.43%)
KSE30 36,398 Increased By 603.9 (1.69%)

A full bench of the Lahore High Court here on Wednesday asked Lahore Development Authority (LDA) to justify urgency being shown in construction of "Elevated Expressway" from Gulberg to Motorway II interchange on Thursday (today). The bench was hearing a number of petitions challenging construction of the expressway and process of land acquisition for Rs 27 billion project.
During the course of hearing, the counsel for LDA Salman Mansoor argued that the construction of the elevated expressway was a public welfare project. He said the project was a mandate of the executive and the court should not take judicial review of the matter. The counsel stated that affected people of the project had appropriate forums for legal remedy under Punjab Land Acquisition Act. He said cases relating to compensation against acquisition of land could be taken civil courts. The bench observed that apparently the government had no convincing ground for acquiring land on the pretext of urgency.
The bench, however, asked the counsel to apprise about the reasons for the construction of the expressway. The bench had been hearing arguments of lawyers representing the government, petitioners and amicus curie as well on the scope and nature of urgency required to invoke Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act.
The petitioners submitted that the government had imposed an emergency like situation and had been acquiring land under section 17 from general public by demolishing their homes to build the expressway. They submitted that the government, however, could not covey them the reasons behind this urgency. The petitioners, therefore, prayed to the court to set aside the project and acquisition of their land.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2014

Comments

Comments are closed.