Spending cuts have left the US Navy and Marines ill-prepared to deal with a sudden conflict, and continuing reductions may mean ships and troops arrive late to the fight and without the training and arms they need, Navy officials said on Tuesday. "Ultimately, this means more ships and aircraft out of action in battle, more sailors, Marines and merchant mariners killed, and less credibility, frankly, to deter adversaries and to assure allies in the future," Admiral Jonathan Greenert, the chief of naval operations, told a Senate hearing.
Greenert's comments to the Senate Armed Services Committee came as the US military presses lawmakers to back President Barack Obama's request for a 2016 Pentagon base budget of $534 billion, which is about $35 billion more than allowed under federal spending limits. A 2011 law passed by Congress required nearly $1 trillion in cuts to projected defence spending over a decade.
Pentagon officials have been sounding alarms about the cuts since the legislation went into force, but this year there have been broad expressions of concern that further reductions could cost lives and jeopardise US response in a crisis. General Joseph Dunford, the Marine commandant, said tight budgets had required his force to prioritise training and equipment for units that were deploying abroad. As a result, about half of the Marine units in the United States "are suffering personnel, equipment and training shortfalls," Dunford said.
Comments
Comments are closed.