AIRLINK 199.95 Decreased By ▼ -12.87 (-6.05%)
BOP 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
CNERGY 6.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.30 (-4.29%)
FCCL 33.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.37 (-1.11%)
FFL 16.71 Decreased By ▼ -0.93 (-5.27%)
FLYNG 22.50 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (3.12%)
HUBC 127.10 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-1.56%)
HUMNL 13.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.07%)
KEL 4.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.65%)
KOSM 6.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.55 (-7.94%)
MLCF 42.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.23 (-2.82%)
OGDC 213.45 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.23%)
PACE 7.07 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-2.08%)
PAEL 41.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.17%)
PIAHCLA 16.95 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.71%)
PIBTL 8.34 Decreased By ▼ -0.29 (-3.36%)
POWER 8.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.45%)
PPL 184.00 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (0.53%)
PRL 38.49 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-2.88%)
PTC 24.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-2.55%)
SEARL 96.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.01 (-2.05%)
SILK 1.01 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 40.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.33 (-3.19%)
SYM 18.12 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-3.92%)
TELE 8.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-2.78%)
TPLP 12.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.61%)
TRG 64.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-1.8%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.37%)
WTL 1.81 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (1.12%)
YOUW 4.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.25%)
BR100 11,748 Decreased By -118.6 (-1%)
BR30 35,470 Decreased By -226.8 (-0.64%)
KSE100 112,886 Decreased By -1262.1 (-1.11%)
KSE30 35,524 Decreased By -428.5 (-1.19%)

This refers to a Business Recorder op-ed "Understated budget deficit" by Dr Hafiz A Pasha. That his argument is nothing short of a charge-sheet against the government is a fact that can be discerned from the following: "Overall, history is likely to be repeating itself once again in 2015-16. In the presence of a larger fiscal deficit than targeted, the MoF may be forced to opt once again, like the last two years, for a large negative 'statistical discrepancy' to show a smaller deficit. Nevertheless, the MoF must be complimented for having convinced the IMF in Dubai that the fiscal deficit is 5.3 percent of the GDP, when it is actually significantly higher". Dr Pasha, therefore, is required to produce incriminating evidence to substantiate his point. Though, reasons spelled out by him are quite interesting, these cannot be taken as facts in the absence of truly cogent reasons because whatever he has said can be easily challenged or countered by the government.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.