AIRLINK 197.00 Increased By ▲ 5.16 (2.69%)
BOP 10.12 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (2.53%)
CNERGY 7.84 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (2.22%)
FCCL 38.30 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (1.16%)
FFL 15.98 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.4%)
FLYNG 25.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.08%)
HUBC 131.70 Increased By ▲ 1.53 (1.18%)
HUMNL 13.74 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.1%)
KEL 4.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.43%)
KOSM 6.35 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (2.25%)
MLCF 45.20 Increased By ▲ 0.91 (2.05%)
OGDC 209.30 Increased By ▲ 2.43 (1.17%)
PACE 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.83%)
PAEL 40.90 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.86%)
PIAHCLA 17.68 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.51%)
PIBTL 8.07 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
POWER 9.39 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.62%)
PPL 180.40 Increased By ▲ 1.84 (1.03%)
PRL 39.80 Increased By ▲ 0.72 (1.84%)
PTC 24.30 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (0.66%)
SEARL 110.55 Increased By ▲ 2.70 (2.5%)
SILK 1.01 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (4.12%)
SSGC 38.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.3%)
SYM 19.21 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.47%)
TELE 8.78 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.09%)
TPLP 12.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.62%)
TRG 65.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.48%)
WAVESAPP 12.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-4.15%)
WTL 1.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.59%)
YOUW 3.99 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (1.01%)
BR100 12,089 Increased By 158.7 (1.33%)
BR30 35,987 Increased By 327.2 (0.92%)
KSE100 115,085 Increased By 1878.5 (1.66%)
KSE30 36,155 Increased By 590 (1.66%)

The signing of MoU between Pakistan Institute of Public Finance Accountants (PIPFA) and Chartered Institute of Public Finance Accountancy (CIPFA) of United Kingdom is a new milestone in the history of accountancy in Pakistan and this initiative is expected to bring Public Finance Management Reforms in Pakistan and enhance the capacity of our National Institutions engaged in Public Finance Management (PFM).
The reforming of PFM helps to improve the Governance in a country. However, the traditional PFM reforms such as the strengthening of national audit offices and the introduction of IT-assisted financial management systems - are,in these days, not seen as a separate area of activity, but frequently from the narrow angle of improving technical efficiency. For PFM reforms to succeed, however, it is vital that their effects on governance are taken into account.
While PFM reform is a central element of governance reforms in many developing countries, addressing corruption is rarely an explicit objective of such reforms. Experience in this range of countries shows that the impact of PFM reform on anti-corruption parameters is difficult to separate from other factors that may have led to positive anti-corruption outcomes. Countries that have seen substantial improvements in the performance of their PFM systems and have been able to reduce corruption, have achieved these positive results within the framework of broader governance reform which were backed by strong political commitment by the national governments.
In Pakistan, while governance structure is considered to be weak and corruption level is perceived to be quite higher, the current government seems to have high commitment for strong PFM and addressing the much publically criticised corruption issue. I am confident that this PFM conference, being sponsored by AGPin collaboration with PIPFA and CIPFA will not only focus on the ways to bring effective PFM reforms for improvement of Governance in Pakistan but will alsohighlight the measures needed to address the issue of corruption.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.