AGL 38.14 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.32%)
AIRLINK 214.51 Increased By ▲ 17.15 (8.69%)
BOP 9.85 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (3.25%)
CNERGY 6.85 Increased By ▲ 0.94 (15.91%)
DCL 9.11 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (3.29%)
DFML 38.60 Increased By ▲ 2.86 (8%)
DGKC 100.40 Increased By ▲ 3.54 (3.65%)
FCCL 36.59 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (3.8%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 14.49 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (10.02%)
HUBC 134.01 Increased By ▲ 6.46 (5.06%)
HUMNL 13.69 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.41%)
KEL 5.70 Increased By ▲ 0.38 (7.14%)
KOSM 7.28 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (4%)
MLCF 45.85 Increased By ▲ 1.15 (2.57%)
NBP 61.70 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.46%)
OGDC 232.80 Increased By ▲ 18.13 (8.45%)
PAEL 40.75 Increased By ▲ 1.96 (5.05%)
PIBTL 8.59 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.12%)
PPL 203.50 Increased By ▲ 10.42 (5.4%)
PRL 40.39 Increased By ▲ 1.73 (4.47%)
PTC 28.26 Increased By ▲ 2.46 (9.53%)
SEARL 109.00 Increased By ▲ 5.40 (5.21%)
TELE 8.73 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (5.18%)
TOMCL 36.00 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.86%)
TPLP 13.90 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (4.51%)
TREET 24.38 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (10.02%)
TRG 61.15 Increased By ▲ 5.56 (10%)
UNITY 34.76 Increased By ▲ 1.79 (5.43%)
WTL 1.72 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (7.5%)
BR100 12,263 Increased By 536.8 (4.58%)
BR30 38,435 Increased By 2058.7 (5.66%)
KSE100 114,070 Increased By 4557.1 (4.16%)
KSE30 36,085 Increased By 1571.5 (4.55%)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday granted leave to appeal to examine constitutionality of all kind of surcharges being collected from consumers in electricity bills which the Lahore High Court Lahore (LHC) had declared unconstitutional. A three-member bench led by Justice Mian Saqib Nisar resumed the hearing of 109 civil petitions of the federation filed against the LHC Lahore judgement in the matter.
Challenging vires of Section 31 (5) of the Regulation of Generation Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act 1997 and surcharges included Equalisation Surcharge, Debt servicing surcharge, Universal Obligation Fund Surcharge and Neelum-Jhelum Surcharge, 269 identical petitioners urged the LHC to decide constitutionally and vires of the provision of the Act.
To which on May 29, 2015, a division bench of the LHC declared these surcharges levied from time to time since 2008 unconstitutional and issued directives to the federal government to refund or adjust the collected amount under the heads of these from the upcoming electricity bills. The LHC also asked the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) to work out a repayment plan within three months and disposed of the petitions Federation has challenged the LHC verdict in the Supreme Court to which the bench on Wednesday granted leave to appeal against the High Court decision and issued notices to the parties of the case.
Appearing on behalf of some petitioners, advocate Azhar Siddique contended that more than 100 billion rupees would be recovered from the electricity consumers pocket saying that since five months consumers are paying the surcharges. Siddique further said that Lahore High Court was not taking up petition regarding surcharge matter as the current case is under adjudication before the apex court. However, issuing notices to the parties of the case, the bench adjourned hearing of the matter till second week of February,2016.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2015

Comments

Comments are closed.