AIRLINK 195.51 Increased By ▲ 1.95 (1.01%)
BOP 10.06 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.11%)
CNERGY 7.94 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
FCCL 40.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.32 (-0.79%)
FFL 17.07 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.25%)
FLYNG 27.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.97%)
HUBC 133.80 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (0.92%)
HUMNL 14.10 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.51%)
KEL 4.67 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.52%)
KOSM 6.65 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.45%)
MLCF 47.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.32%)
OGDC 215.27 Increased By ▲ 1.36 (0.64%)
PACE 6.97 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.58%)
PAEL 41.75 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (1.24%)
PIAHCLA 17.20 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.29%)
PIBTL 8.52 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.31%)
POWER 9.67 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.31%)
PPL 184.69 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (1.28%)
PRL 42.75 Increased By ▲ 0.79 (1.88%)
PTC 25.07 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.68%)
SEARL 106.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.84 (-0.79%)
SILK 0.99 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 44.11 Increased By ▲ 4.01 (10%)
SYM 17.83 Increased By ▲ 0.36 (2.06%)
TELE 9.00 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (1.81%)
TPLP 13.01 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.04%)
TRG 67.65 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.05%)
WAVESAPP 11.54 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (1.85%)
WTL 1.83 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (2.23%)
YOUW 4.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.49%)
BR100 12,197 Increased By 152.6 (1.27%)
BR30 36,929 Increased By 348.5 (0.95%)
KSE100 115,129 Increased By 1090.9 (0.96%)
KSE30 36,186 Increased By 391.8 (1.09%)

Germany's highest court on Wednesday struck down key planks of an anti-terror law, saying they violated privacy protections enshrined in the constitution. The legislation passed in 2008 which covers surveillance of terror suspects by the federal police must be reworked by June 2018, the Federal Constitutional Court in the south-western city of Karlsruhe ruled.
The law gave investigators sweeping powers to use secret cameras and bugging devices in private homes and to install government-developed surveillance software on personal computers in a bid to prevent attacks. Controversially, it specifically allowed snooping in the bedroom and bathroom, and for people not targeted in an investigation to be observed if they are with a suspect. The scarlet-robed judges said in their verdict in the high-profile case that while the thrust of the measures is covered by Germany's Basic Law, they found "several individual provisions allowing disproportionate encroachment on privacy".
The court said that before the federal police use data collected during surveillance operations, an "independent service" must review them to determine whether they contain "information of a highly private nature". In addition, surveillance may only be carried out against a suspect outside his home if there is a "strong likelihood" he could commit a "terrorist act in the near future".
And the ruling bars data from being shared with other domestic or foreign intelligence services without a "specific threat of attack". Germany has strict constitutional protections on state security powers to prevent the kind of egregious abuses committed by the Nazi and communist dictatorships. The challenge was brought by former interior minister Gerhart Baum of the liberal Free Democratic Party and members of the opposition Greens, who argued that the level of intrusion into citizens' privacy was unconstitutional.
In testimony to the tribunal last July, Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere defended the law, saying the government had used the powers judiciously and claiming that they had helped prevent a dozen attacks on German soil.
De Maiziere pledged Wednesday to "respect and implement" the changes to the law required by the court. However, he criticised the new hurdles imposed by the ruling as restricting law enforcement capabilities. "You can see how real the terror threat has become in Europe and Germany with the horrible attacks of late, in particular in Brussels, Paris and Istanbul," he told reporters. De Maiziere stressed that he did not share many of the court's concerns, adding that taking them into account now "won't make the fight against international terror any easier".

Copyright Agence France-Presse, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.