AIRLINK 191.54 Decreased By ▼ -21.28 (-10%)
BOP 10.23 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.2%)
CNERGY 6.69 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-4.43%)
FCCL 33.02 Decreased By ▼ -0.45 (-1.34%)
FFL 16.60 Decreased By ▼ -1.04 (-5.9%)
FLYNG 22.45 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (2.89%)
HUBC 126.60 Decreased By ▼ -2.51 (-1.94%)
HUMNL 13.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.22%)
KEL 4.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.44%)
KOSM 6.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.58 (-8.37%)
MLCF 42.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-3.51%)
OGDC 213.01 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.03%)
PACE 7.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.35%)
PAEL 40.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.87 (-2.11%)
PIAHCLA 16.85 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.12%)
PIBTL 8.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-4.4%)
POWER 8.85 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.45%)
PPL 182.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.08%)
PRL 38.10 Decreased By ▼ -1.53 (-3.86%)
PTC 23.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.83 (-3.36%)
SEARL 93.50 Decreased By ▼ -4.51 (-4.6%)
SILK 1.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.99%)
SSGC 39.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.88 (-4.51%)
SYM 18.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.42 (-2.23%)
TELE 8.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.78%)
TPLP 12.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.35 (-2.82%)
TRG 64.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-1.8%)
WAVESAPP 10.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.48 (-4.37%)
WTL 1.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.56%)
YOUW 3.96 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-1.74%)
BR100 11,697 Decreased By -168.8 (-1.42%)
BR30 35,252 Decreased By -445.3 (-1.25%)
KSE100 112,638 Decreased By -1510.2 (-1.32%)
KSE30 35,458 Decreased By -494 (-1.37%)

The unlawful practice being exercised by the Directorate of Intelligence and Investigation, (DI&I) Customs-FBR to transfer the custody of seized consignments in most of the cases to the terminal operators has reportedly cost millions to the national exchequer. The issue came on the surface when the Directorate of Internal Audit (DIA) has established an observation on this illicit practice.
According to the observation, which is exclusively available to the daily, revealed that DI&I in most of the cases gave the custody of seized consignments/containers to the terminal operators by taking the shadow of section 169 of the Customs Act 1969. However, the DIA has claimed that there is no such provision is available to authorise the seizing staff to give the seized goods under the custody to the person other than authorised customs officer under section 169 of the Act.
Therefore, the DIA termed the said practice as unlawful, which has so far cost millions to the national exchequer. It further said that there was no record of seized goods in the state warehouse and no one knows the where-about of confiscated goods, due to the said unlawful practice regarding the transfer of its custody to unauthorised authority.
Subsequently, the DIA has directed the DI&I to stop the said practice and urged its senior management to look into the matter and take requisite action to protect the government revenue.
It also suggested the Directorate to carry out study of the cases wherein confiscated goods were still under the custody of irrelevant person other than the officer of customs and take further action to recover the legitimate government revenue. The DIA has not only ordered the DI&I to furnish a detailed report in this regard and submit it within a month but also restricted it to justify this omission and take measures for the auction of confiscated goods.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.