AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 127.04 Decreased By ▼ -0.95 (-0.74%)
BOP 6.67 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.06%)
CNERGY 4.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-1.96%)
DCL 8.55 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.83%)
DFML 41.44 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.1%)
DGKC 86.85 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (0.31%)
FCCL 32.28 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.44%)
FFBL 64.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-0.95%)
FFL 10.25 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
HUBC 109.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-0.83%)
HUMNL 14.68 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.47%)
KEL 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.56%)
KOSM 7.46 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.78%)
MLCF 41.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-0.65%)
NBP 60.41 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (0.53%)
OGDC 190.10 Decreased By ▼ -4.59 (-2.36%)
PAEL 27.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.43%)
PIBTL 7.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.13%)
PPL 150.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.11 (-0.73%)
PRL 26.88 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
PTC 16.07 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.44%)
SEARL 86.00 Increased By ▲ 7.80 (9.97%)
TELE 7.71 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.33%)
TOMCL 35.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.73%)
TPLP 8.12 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.65%)
TREET 16.41 Increased By ▲ 0.52 (3.27%)
TRG 53.29 Increased By ▲ 0.53 (1%)
UNITY 26.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.47%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
BR100 9,884 Decreased By -36.4 (-0.37%)
BR30 30,600 Decreased By -151.5 (-0.49%)
KSE100 93,355 Increased By 130.9 (0.14%)
KSE30 28,931 Increased By 46 (0.16%)

The Senate Standing Committee on National Food Security and Research on Wednesday recommended the imposition of Regulatory Duty (RD) on the import of cotton bale from India. The committee, which met with Senator Syed Muzaffar Hussain Shah in the chair, observed that import of cotton lint from India via Wagha border despite sufficient stock in the country would adversely affect cotton growers.
The committee urged Ministry of Finance to direct Federal Bureau of Revenue (FBR) to impose RD on import of cotton from India. A senior official of Ministry of Commerce informed the committee that presently approximately 400,000 cotton bales are available in the country.
"Out of 400,000 cotton bales available in the country 64,000 are with Trading Cooperation of Pakistan (TCP) and the rest with growers and other agencies", the official said. Under Import Policy 2013, All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA) imported 500,000 extra long staple cotton every year and they have imported it two months ago, he said, adding now they have requested for further import of cotton bales from India but the ministry has so far not allowed further import of cotton.
Shah said that arrival of new cotton crop in the market has already started therefore import of cotton from India will substantially add to the existing cotton stock. Cotton Commissioner Dr Khalid Abdullah informed that Pakistan is importing extra long staple cotton from United States and some other countries then why APTMA is urging for import of cotton from India.
Senator Saud Majeed said that the main reason behind import of cotton from India is that India gives subsidies on export of all surplus commodities which is not available to farming community in Pakistan. Due to massive subsidies on export of surplus commodities cotton in India, cotton is cheaper in India as compared to Pakistan, he said. The standing committee strongly felt that the good quality of cotton should be imported from US and other countries which is the valid justification of import of the same. However, there is no justification to import cotton bale from India when same quality is also available in the country.
The committee requested the Ministry of Finance to consider this recommendation on priority basis to protect agriculture sector especially cotton growers. Abdullah informed the committee that cotton cultivation in Sindh and Punjab province is progressing in slower pace as compared to last year. Overwhelming installation of sugar industry in some of the areas has taken over the cotton areas in such districts and uncertainty of cotton prices is one of the reasons behind the slower sowing of the cotton, he said, adding, country has witnessed 12 percent decline in cotton cultivation this year as compared to last year.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.