AGL 38.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-1.34%)
AIRLINK 141.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.00 (-1.39%)
BOP 5.64 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (7.63%)
CNERGY 3.87 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (4.03%)
DCL 7.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.26%)
DFML 47.40 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (2.16%)
DGKC 79.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.13 (-1.4%)
FCCL 27.44 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.07%)
FFBL 54.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.27%)
FFL 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.47%)
HUBC 113.51 Increased By ▲ 2.49 (2.24%)
HUMNL 11.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-1.93%)
KEL 3.99 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (5.84%)
KOSM 8.54 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.52%)
MLCF 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.57%)
NBP 63.80 Increased By ▲ 2.45 (3.99%)
OGDC 169.40 Decreased By ▼ -2.50 (-1.45%)
PAEL 25.18 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-2.33%)
PIBTL 5.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.34%)
PPL 125.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.80 (-1.41%)
PRL 24.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.79 (-3.09%)
PTC 13.26 Increased By ▲ 1.11 (9.14%)
SEARL 57.45 Increased By ▲ 0.45 (0.79%)
TELE 7.12 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.28%)
TOMCL 35.00 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.57%)
TPLP 7.45 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (7.19%)
TREET 14.32 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (3.39%)
TRG 46.54 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-1.08%)
UNITY 26.18 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.5%)
WTL 1.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.83%)
BR100 9,091 Decreased By -2.4 (-0.03%)
BR30 27,347 Increased By 28.9 (0.11%)
KSE100 85,669 Increased By 5.3 (0.01%)
KSE30 27,216 Decreased By -224.9 (-0.82%)

The Directorate General, Intelligence & Investigation Inland Revenue (IR) has asked the Commissioner Appeals to take measures for avoiding circumstances where taxpayer gets undue benefit in appeal process owing to non-representation by the I&I-IR at the level of CIR Appeals and appellate tribunals. Sources told Business Recorder here on Tuesday that the Director General Intelligence & Investigation Inland Revenue has approached Chairman FBR requesting him to contact Commissioner Appeals.
According to the agency, Directorate General, Intelligence & Investigation-IR is a premier agency for detecting tax fraudsters. After detection of evasion of sales tax, income tax and FED cases, the reports are forwarded to field formations, ie, RTOs/LTUs for adjudication/assessment and recovery of evaded tax. It has been noticed that in the cases reported by I&I-IR the taxpayers aggrieved from the orders of adjudicating/assessing authority do not incorporate Director I&I-IR as respondent before the appellate fora. Accordingly the I&I-IR remains unaware of the appeal proceedings and the appellant taxpayer gets undue benefit in appeal owing to non-representation by the I&I-IR. Such an instance has come to the fore where an order-in-original involving sales tax demand of Rs 268 million in pursuance of a contravention report of Directorate of I&I-IR, Lahore. However, in second appeal the Appellate Tribunal-IR unjustifiably vacated the order of the lower appellate authority. It is believed that the department would have succeeded had the case been represented by I&I-IR as a respondent.
In a few cases the Director, I&I-IR, Lahore requested CIR (Appeals) to treat Director I&I-IR as respondent in the tax fraud cases reported by the Directorate I&I-IR but the request was not acceded to by the appellate authority. In order to satisfy the high principles of justice, it would be fair to admit the Director I&I-IR as respondent in those cases which have been created and reported by the Directorate I&I-IR, Lahore.
In view of the above, the CIR (Appeals) may be directed to consider the Director I&I-IR as respondent in the cases reported by the Directorates and not to entertain the aggrieved taxpayer's appeal unless Director I&I-IR is made a respondent, DG I&I-IR added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.