AGL 40.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.90 (-2.2%)
AIRLINK 127.80 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-0.27%)
BOP 6.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-1.49%)
CNERGY 4.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.77%)
DCL 8.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.35%)
DFML 41.40 Increased By ▲ 0.31 (0.75%)
DGKC 86.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.63 (-0.72%)
FCCL 32.13 Decreased By ▼ -1.26 (-3.77%)
FFBL 65.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
FFL 10.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.91%)
HUBC 110.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.03%)
HUMNL 14.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.60 (-3.92%)
KEL 5.15 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (3.41%)
KOSM 7.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3.77%)
MLCF 41.69 Decreased By ▼ -1.30 (-3.02%)
NBP 60.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.36%)
OGDC 194.48 Decreased By ▼ -3.16 (-1.6%)
PAEL 27.95 Decreased By ▼ -1.06 (-3.65%)
PIBTL 7.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-3.39%)
PPL 150.52 Decreased By ▼ -3.64 (-2.36%)
PRL 27.08 Increased By ▲ 2.08 (8.32%)
PTC 16.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.06%)
SEARL 78.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-0.32%)
TELE 7.42 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.68%)
TOMCL 35.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-1.08%)
TPLP 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.17 (-2.11%)
TREET 15.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.56%)
TRG 52.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.24%)
UNITY 26.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
WTL 1.28 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.79%)
BR100 9,920 Decreased By -52.1 (-0.52%)
BR30 30,751 Decreased By -346.3 (-1.11%)
KSE100 93,225 Decreased By -423.8 (-0.45%)
KSE30 28,885 Decreased By -132.9 (-0.46%)

State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) has pointed out that confiscation of property in the proposed Benami Transactions Law is against the Federal Legislative List; hence, it should be reconsidered. A copy of an official document available with Business Recorder stated that the SBP commented as per proposed law, if Benami property is confiscated, it will vest in the federal government.
This needs to be reconsidered because Article 172(1) of the Constitution provides: "Any property which has no rightful owner, if located in a province, will vest in the government of that province, and in every other case, in the federal government." The Federal Legislative List and definition of 'property' provided that power to legislate in respect of property vests in the provinces. The law, therefore, may be reconsidered in consultation with the provinces or Federal Law Ministry.
The SBP stated that the section 18 empowers the authorities under the proposed Act to seek information from any person. This should be subject to any law for secrecy of banking information or unpublished record of the State Bank. While under section 19, the Authority has been given free access to any premises or information at anytime without notice. This should either be subject to warrant and restricted to reasonable time or working hours. Otherwise it may not only be violation of right to privacy as provided under Articles 14 of the Constitution of Pakistan, but the Authorities may also face resistance form semi-literate armed security guards of public or private institutions. The SBP also pointed out that the section 22 of the proposed law does not provide any limitation period. If a Benami transaction is alleged in respect of property acquired for example 20-30 years ago, the owner might have lost all record or proof of payment of consideration, There should be some limitation period for reopening the past transactions.
The regulator stated. "We understand that the Benami Transactions are already prohibited under section 423 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860, harmonization whereof with the subject law may be considered."
The section 17 of the proposed Act provides that various authorities including SBP are required to assist the Authorities under the law. There are no provisions as to the cost or extent of assistance. The SBP may assist in providing information available with it or issuing directions to the banks under law. However, it is not clear if SBP officers are called by authorities for assistance in investigation on deputation, who will pay their salaries or other allowance for that period and if they are subsequently called for giving evidence in a case pertaining to their work with Authorities under the Act.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2016

Comments

Comments are closed.