AIRLINK 207.59 Decreased By ▼ -3.38 (-1.6%)
BOP 10.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.51 (-4.78%)
CNERGY 6.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-7.02%)
FCCL 33.85 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.83%)
FFL 17.23 Decreased By ▼ -1.18 (-6.41%)
FLYNG 23.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.62 (-2.62%)
HUBC 129.43 Decreased By ▼ -1.96 (-1.49%)
HUMNL 14.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.64%)
KEL 4.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-3.82%)
KOSM 6.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-3.07%)
MLCF 43.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.66 (-1.51%)
OGDC 208.00 Decreased By ▼ -5.56 (-2.6%)
PACE 6.98 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-6.31%)
PAEL 39.25 Decreased By ▼ -2.28 (-5.49%)
PIAHCLA 17.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-2.69%)
PIBTL 8.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-3.14%)
POWERPS 12.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.08%)
PPL 182.50 Decreased By ▼ -7.10 (-3.74%)
PRL 41.01 Decreased By ▼ -3.30 (-7.45%)
PTC 24.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.47 (-1.88%)
SEARL 101.00 Decreased By ▼ -2.37 (-2.29%)
SILK 1.04 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.97%)
SSGC 36.60 Decreased By ▼ -3.90 (-9.63%)
SYM 18.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-4.71%)
TELE 8.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.49 (-5.19%)
TPLP 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.75 (-5.56%)
TRG 65.20 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (1.13%)
WAVESAPP 10.37 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-4.86%)
WTL 1.60 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.03%)
YOUW 4.06 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-3.56%)
BR100 11,831 Decreased By -359.8 (-2.95%)
BR30 35,422 Decreased By -1160.2 (-3.17%)
KSE100 114,325 Decreased By -1930.3 (-1.66%)
KSE30 35,938 Decreased By -665.6 (-1.82%)

The Lahore High Court has sought reply from the Punjab government and Higher Education Department by May 29 in a petition challenging appointments of director education (colleges) DG Khan and principal of Government College, Ravi Road. The petitioner, Muhammad Ali Shakuri, pleaded that the government appointed Dr Altaf Hussain as director education (colleges) DG Khan Division and Dr Muhammad Mufakkir as principal of Government College, Ravi Road, in violation of criteria for the posts of professors.
The petitioner's counsel, Nasir Qureshi, argued before the court that the advertisement had required the candidates to submit six research papers in principal journals besides other qualification. The lawyer stated that the research papers submitted by the both respondents were invalid for being published in either ghost or non-recognized journals.

Comments

Comments are closed.