AIRLINK 193.77 Decreased By ▼ -6.98 (-3.48%)
BOP 9.87 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-3.33%)
CNERGY 7.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.82%)
FCCL 39.41 Decreased By ▼ -0.65 (-1.62%)
FFL 16.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.52 (-3.09%)
FLYNG 25.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.81 (-3.04%)
HUBC 129.86 Decreased By ▼ -2.74 (-2.07%)
HUMNL 13.83 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.65%)
KEL 4.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.58%)
KOSM 6.47 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.82%)
MLCF 45.57 Decreased By ▼ -1.17 (-2.5%)
OGDC 209.11 Decreased By ▼ -3.32 (-1.56%)
PACE 6.72 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-2.61%)
PAEL 41.85 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (1.38%)
PIAHCLA 17.13 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.76%)
PIBTL 7.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.59%)
POWER 9.36 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.64%)
PPL 177.92 Decreased By ▼ -3.54 (-1.95%)
PRL 39.01 Decreased By ▼ -2.77 (-6.63%)
PTC 25.53 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (3.36%)
SEARL 106.73 Decreased By ▼ -5.11 (-4.57%)
SILK 0.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-1%)
SSGC 39.53 Decreased By ▼ -4.39 (-10%)
SYM 19.45 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (2.48%)
TELE 8.64 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.59%)
TPLP 12.53 Decreased By ▼ -0.39 (-3.02%)
TRG 65.34 Decreased By ▼ -2.13 (-3.16%)
WAVESAPP 11.15 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-2.36%)
WTL 1.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-3.35%)
YOUW 3.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-1.25%)
BR100 12,030 Decreased By -140.3 (-1.15%)
BR30 35,812 Decreased By -776.7 (-2.12%)
KSE100 113,520 Decreased By -1360.2 (-1.18%)
KSE30 35,651 Decreased By -473.7 (-1.31%)

Dr Hafeez A. Pasha has written an article published in Business Recorder dated 16-01-2018 regarding public spending on Pro-Poor expenditure which has been released by PRSP Secretariat, Ministry of Finance. The figures and data which the writer has reported are not correct. Finance Division offers its comment in this regard as follows:
The article reveals that pro-poor expenditure in 2016-17 is estimated at 37 percent of overall public expenditure and equivalent to 7.8 percent of GDP as compared to 9 percent of the GDP in 2012-13, which shows that Pro Poor expenditures have been "crowded out" by other major public expenditures like debt servicing and defense. The author has further stated that that PRSP expenditure stood at Rs 2.5 trillion in FY2016/17. The growth rate over the period was 9 percent, the share of income transfers and subsidies accounted for a share of 27 percent in 2016/17 and federal share is approximately 25 percent and consists mostly of outlays on the BISP and subsidies. The author has mentioned that total pro poor spending in 2016/17 is estimated at 37 percent of overall public expenditure and also the share of current expenditure is over 80 percent and only 20 percent is being devoted to development expenditures.
In this regard, the correct figure of total PRSP expenditures was recorded at Rs 3.03 trillion during FY2016/17 as reported by the PRSP Secretariat and not Rs 2.5 trillion as reported in the article. The PRSP expenditures increased by 12.36 percent from Rs 2.7 trillion in FY2015/16 to Rs 3.03 trillion in FY2016/17. Similarly, the share of pro-poor spending in overall public expenditure is estimated at 44.6 percent instead of 37 percent as mentioned by the author.
With regard to total PRSP expenditures as percentage of GDP during FY2016/17, it stood at 9.5 percent instead of 7.8 percent as stated by the author. Thus, the claim that PRSP expenditure as percentage of GDP has declined since FY2012/13 is not correct.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.