AGL 40.40 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.5%)
AIRLINK 129.25 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (0.11%)
BOP 6.81 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (3.18%)
CNERGY 4.13 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (2.48%)
DCL 8.73 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.31%)
DFML 41.40 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (0.36%)
DGKC 87.75 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (0.86%)
FCCL 33.85 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.5%)
FFBL 66.40 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (0.76%)
FFL 10.69 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.42%)
HUBC 113.51 Increased By ▲ 2.81 (2.54%)
HUMNL 15.65 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (2.76%)
KEL 4.87 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.88%)
KOSM 7.62 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.68%)
MLCF 43.10 Increased By ▲ 1.20 (2.86%)
NBP 61.50 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (1.65%)
OGDC 192.20 Increased By ▲ 9.40 (5.14%)
PAEL 27.05 Increased By ▲ 1.69 (6.66%)
PIBTL 7.26 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (15.97%)
PPL 150.50 Increased By ▲ 2.69 (1.82%)
PRL 24.96 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (1.63%)
PTC 16.25 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.06%)
SEARL 71.30 Increased By ▲ 0.80 (1.13%)
TELE 7.25 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-0.68%)
TOMCL 36.29 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.03%)
TPLP 8.05 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.55%)
TREET 16.30 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (6.54%)
TRG 51.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.27%)
UNITY 27.35 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
WTL 1.27 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (3.25%)
BR100 9,967 Increased By 125.2 (1.27%)
BR30 30,751 Increased By 714.7 (2.38%)
KSE100 93,292 Increased By 771.2 (0.83%)
KSE30 29,017 Increased By 230.5 (0.8%)

Directorate General Customs Valuation (DGCV) has revised the customs values of chewing gum and mint under sub-section (7) of the section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969.
According to details, earlier the customs values of chewing gum were determined through valuation ruling No. 1000 in 2016. However, various representations were received from the importers for re-determination of the customs value of said goods. Therefore, an exercise was initiated by the Directorate to re-determine the customs values of chewing gum and mints.
For the purpose, the meetings with stakeholders, including importers and representatives from field formations, were held in March, July and September 2018 to discuss the current international prices of the subject goods.
Meanwhile, the importers of Wrigley's brand stated that values already determined were correctly reflecting transaction values while certain other brands importers requested to include their items in the ruling and presented documents in support of their contentions.
The importer of Batook brand claimed that customs values already determined in the existing Ruling were high and contended that this brand was being brought into our country from illegal means, causing loss to the exchequer.
Later, the Directorate applied the valuation methods provided in section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 in their regular sequential order to address the particular valuation issue at hand. The transaction value method as provided in sub-section (1) of section 25, was found inapplicable in light of the wide variety of declared values at import stage, hence requisite information required under law was not available to arrive at the correct transaction value.
The similar goods value method provided vide sub-sections (5) & (6) of section 25 ibid was examined for applicability to determine customs value of subject goods. This data provided some references however it was found that the same cannot be solely relied upon.
In line with the statutory sequential order of section 25, the Directorate then conducted market inquiries using deductive value method under sub-section (7) of the section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 and determined customs values of chewing gum and mints accordingly.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.