AGL 40.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.05%)
AIRLINK 128.10 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (0.31%)
BOP 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.06%)
CNERGY 4.57 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.65%)
DCL 8.80 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.11%)
DFML 41.80 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.53%)
DGKC 86.00 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (0.24%)
FCCL 32.68 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.58%)
FFBL 64.38 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (0.55%)
FFL 11.15 Increased By ▲ 0.60 (5.69%)
HUBC 110.99 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.2%)
HUMNL 14.91 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.06%)
KEL 4.90 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.41%)
KOSM 7.43 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.27%)
MLCF 40.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.22 (-0.54%)
NBP 61.75 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.15%)
OGDC 194.98 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.06%)
PAEL 27.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.22%)
PIBTL 7.84 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.38%)
PPL 153.50 Increased By ▲ 0.97 (0.64%)
PRL 26.87 Increased By ▲ 0.29 (1.09%)
PTC 16.20 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.37%)
SEARL 84.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.05%)
TELE 8.02 Increased By ▲ 0.06 (0.75%)
TOMCL 36.94 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.93%)
TPLP 8.75 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.04%)
TREET 17.38 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.59%)
TRG 58.90 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (0.48%)
UNITY 26.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.07%)
WTL 1.38 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
BR100 10,000 No Change 0 (0%)
BR30 31,002 No Change 0 (0%)
KSE100 94,644 Increased By 452.5 (0.48%)
KSE30 29,391 Increased By 189.5 (0.65%)

A division bench of the Islamabad High Court on Tuesday turned down a petition of the Federal Government Employees Housing Foundation (FGEHF), challenging IHC verdict which had declared the acquisition of land for the Foundation in Sectors F-14 and F-15 as illegal.
The IHC dual bench comprising Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani heard FGEHF's intra-court appeal (ICA) and rejected the same.
While declaring the acquisition proceedings for acquiring land in sectors F-14 and F-15 for the FGEHF as illegal, Justice Athar Minallah had stated in his judgment that land within the Islamabad Capital Territory (ICT) can only be acquired under CDA's Ordinance of 1960.
In addition, he had stated that as per regulations made under that law, the FGEHF and its role in matters relating to development, town planning or housing in areas where the ordinance is enforced, is illegal, void and without lawful authority.
"The federal government, directly or indirectly, is not empowered to deal with or engage in matters relating to development, town planning or housing otherwise than as expressly provided under section 5 of the Ordinance of 1960," Justice Minallah had stated.
Members of the judiciary, powerful bureaucrats, influential lawyers and journalists were among the beneficiaries of the FGEHF upcoming sectors.
In the landmark judgment, Justice Minallah had noted, "Beneficiaries (of both sectors) are serving or retired officers and employees of federal ministries, divisions, attached departments...judges of the superior courts, i.e, the honorable Supreme Court, all the high courts, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Supreme Court and the Chief Court and Supreme Appellate Court of Gilgit-Baltistan, as well as the Federal Shariat Court."

Copyright Business Recorder, 2018

Comments

Comments are closed.