AGL 37.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.08%)
AIRLINK 210.99 Increased By ▲ 13.63 (6.91%)
BOP 9.62 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.84%)
CNERGY 6.40 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (8.29%)
DCL 9.29 Increased By ▲ 0.47 (5.33%)
DFML 37.40 Increased By ▲ 1.66 (4.64%)
DGKC 98.16 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (1.34%)
FCCL 35.95 Increased By ▲ 0.70 (1.99%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 14.12 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (7.21%)
HUBC 129.50 Increased By ▲ 1.95 (1.53%)
HUMNL 13.80 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (2.22%)
KEL 5.48 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (3.01%)
KOSM 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.57%)
MLCF 45.31 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.36%)
NBP 60.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.92 (-1.5%)
OGDC 220.25 Increased By ▲ 5.58 (2.6%)
PAEL 40.90 Increased By ▲ 2.11 (5.44%)
PIBTL 8.45 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (2.42%)
PPL 198.74 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (2.93%)
PRL 40.13 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (3.8%)
PTC 27.60 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (6.98%)
SEARL 108.11 Increased By ▲ 4.51 (4.35%)
TELE 8.64 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (4.1%)
TOMCL 35.66 Increased By ▲ 0.66 (1.89%)
TPLP 13.70 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (3.01%)
TREET 24.38 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (10.02%)
TRG 61.15 Increased By ▲ 5.56 (10%)
UNITY 34.20 Increased By ▲ 1.23 (3.73%)
WTL 1.69 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (5.63%)
BR100 12,045 Increased By 318.3 (2.71%)
BR30 37,342 Increased By 965.5 (2.65%)
KSE100 112,602 Increased By 3088.7 (2.82%)
KSE30 35,525 Increased By 1012 (2.93%)

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) hearing the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) appeal against trial court's verdict on acquitting the PPP's Co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari from two references pertaining to the polo ground and Ursus tractors, has sought complete record of cases.
A divisional bench of IHC comprising Chief Justice of IHC Justice Athar Minallah and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb on Thursday conducted hearing on the NAB appeal and sought the record of references against Zardari from the accountability court, which had acquitted the accused.
During the hearing, NAB Prosecutor Jehanzeb Bharwana appeared before the court and presented his arguments. He adopted before the court that the court had sought the required record on April 21, 2016. However, no record has been presented yet.
He argued that Zardari was given a benefit of the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO), which was later declared null and void by the Supreme Court, but at that time Zardari was the president of Pakistan. Bharwana added that an acquittal application could not be entertained without recording the evidence.
At this, Justice Athar asked then why the accountability court heard the acquittal application. The NAB prosecutor said that the accountability court had maintained that it would be wastage of time to conduct the trial.
Later, the NAB prosecutor sought more time in the references against Zardari, which has been fixed by the court for hearing after three years. Then, the IHC bench deferred hearing for an indefinite period.
The NAB had stated in its appeal that the trial court had no powers to acquit the accused in corruption case. The anti-graft body had challenged the acquittal of Zardari by an accountability court in two references in 2014. The last hearing on NAB's appeal was held on April 21, 2016.
The NAB had moved the IHC through its prosecutor general and challenged AC decision in which it had acquitted Zardari in two corruption references including polo ground and Ursus tractors corruption references.
In the application, NAB had cited Zardari as a respondent and pleaded the court to declare the said verdict of AC as null and void. The NAB prosecutor had also requested the court to permit them to produce witnesses and evidences against Zardari before the court in this matter.
Earlier, Accountability Court (AC) Islamabad had acquitted former President Asif Ali Zardari from two corruption cases as the NAB failed to give any proof and produce any witness. The court announced the verdict saying the accused had not been proven guilty so far. It further stated that evidence against the former president was not sufficient for further proceedings.
The counsel for the former president had contended before the court that the main accused in these references had already been acquitted, so a co-accused could not be tried and should be acquitted under the NAB Ordinance, 1999.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.