AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

The Lahore High Court on Wednesday upheld the decision of tax tribunal setting aside the suo motu powers of Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) to collect sales tax without registering a business person under Sale Tax Act 1990 and Sale Tax Rules 2006.
A two member bench comprising Justice Sajid Mahmood Sethi and Justice Muzammil Akhtar Shabir announced verdict by upholding the judgment of tax tribunal of LHC on the petitions moved by SK Steels mills and others.
The court held that the FBR will first register the business community as taxpersons and then will proceed for collection of sale tax under section 3 of Sale Tax Act 1990. It further added that all such collections of FBR from unregistered persons or any businessman will be unlawful. The petitioners SK Steels and others through Ajmal Khan Advocate argued that the FBR was collecting tax without giving any notice of recovery to them. He said that this practice of the FBR is tantamount to harassing the business sector which is already paying huge taxes and duties to the government.
He also pointed out that there was section 19 in the act which empowers the FBR for compulsory registration but this section was omitted and was inserted again in the Sales Tax Rules 2006. Under rule 6 sub rule 4 of the STR 2006, the FBR is bound firstly to register a business man compulsory and then it will precede further under section 3 and 7 by granting the registered person an opportunity of raising objections on the FBR demand notices. He further pointed out that registered persons and liable to be registered persons are two different things.
The counsel of FBR in reply submitted that the department had the power to collect the sales tax from any business person and there is no bar under the act which restrained the FBR from doing so. The FBR has powers to collect the sales tax from the registered persons and liable to be registered persons, he added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.