AGL 40.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.02%)
AIRLINK 127.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.99 (-0.77%)
BOP 6.68 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (1.21%)
CNERGY 4.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-2.39%)
DCL 8.60 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (1.42%)
DFML 41.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.43%)
DGKC 86.71 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.15%)
FCCL 32.16 Increased By ▲ 0.02 (0.06%)
FFBL 64.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.1%)
FFL 10.29 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.39%)
HUBC 109.51 Decreased By ▼ -0.98 (-0.89%)
HUMNL 14.90 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.02%)
KEL 5.05 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.56%)
KOSM 7.40 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.93%)
MLCF 41.39 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.62%)
NBP 60.60 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.85%)
OGDC 190.00 Decreased By ▼ -4.69 (-2.41%)
PAEL 27.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.5%)
PIBTL 7.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.13%)
PPL 149.75 Decreased By ▼ -1.42 (-0.94%)
PRL 26.73 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-0.56%)
PTC 16.18 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (1.13%)
SEARL 86.02 Increased By ▲ 7.82 (10%)
TELE 7.72 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (4.47%)
TOMCL 35.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.25%)
TPLP 8.14 Increased By ▲ 0.23 (2.91%)
TREET 16.51 Increased By ▲ 0.62 (3.9%)
TRG 53.35 Increased By ▲ 0.59 (1.12%)
UNITY 26.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.27 (-1.02%)
WTL 1.26 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.79%)
BR100 9,889 Decreased By -31.1 (-0.31%)
BR30 30,611 Decreased By -140.9 (-0.46%)
KSE100 93,355 Increased By 130.9 (0.14%)
KSE30 28,931 Increased By 46 (0.16%)

Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday rejected the compliance report of Defence Ministry regarding the court orders, which put a ban on use of military land for commercial purposes in metropolis. At Karachi Registry, a two-member bench of the SC comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmed and Justice Mazhar Alam took up the report of defence secretary, which was submitted in compliance with the court's orders issued on January 22, 2019 about the use of military land for commercial activities when the bench resumed the hearing on razing the encroachments.
Attorney General Anwar Mansoor Khan, Defence Secretary Ikramul Haq, representatives of cantonment boards and officials of various other departments appeared before the court. Following the submission of the report, Justice Gulzar termed the report unsatisfactory and said that it was merely eyewash as the court's orders were not implemented regarding the ban on use of military land for commercial purposes.
The court asked defence secretary to tell it as why its orders were not implemented when the attorney general said that only one point was not acted upon. "In fact, the whole order was not implemented," Justice Gulzar stated. Justice Gulzar said that this report is simply lollipop to deceive the court, at which the attorney general said that it is implementation report.
Justice Gulzar said that defence ministry is not acting upon the orders of the apex court. "If defence ministry is not to implement the orders, then the apex court should be shut down," he remarked. Justice Gulzar said that the defence secretary doesn't know anything about the situation as he is living in a comfortable zone in Islamabad when the defence secretary told the court that only two points of the order have been left to be acted upon.
Addressing the attorney general, Justice Gulzar said, "You are saying that the court's orders are being implemented, then why a marriage hall on the land of Pakistan Air Force (PAF) is being run." The bench head also observed that common man wants the removal of encroachment from cantonment areas first, then he would abolish the encroachment. He said that bulldozers would be ready to demolish the encroachments if the government was willing to do so.
The court also expressed displeasure over the report without the signatures of the authority concerned. "First take this report and get it signed from anyone," Justice Gulzar asked the defence secretary. About the allotment of nine acres of government land by Army to a private party, the court questioned why this land had been allotted and on whose orders, this was done.
The attorney general told the court that this land was allotted by a colonel of the army, who has now retired from the service. Justice Gulzar also questioned the occupation of land, allocated for parks and play grounds in the city and said that these lands have been usurped by naming them after martyrs and remarked that what sort of work is being carried out in the city.
The court rejected the review petition of the cantonment board against its order of January 22, which envisages use of military land for commercial activities. The bench also ordered defence secretary to ensure complete compliance of its orders, restraining use of military land for commercial purposes.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.