AIRLINK 194.01 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.26%)
BOP 9.77 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (1.35%)
CNERGY 7.58 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.66%)
FCCL 37.90 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.53%)
FFL 15.65 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (0.32%)
FLYNG 25.94 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (1.37%)
HUBC 128.99 Increased By ▲ 1.92 (1.51%)
HUMNL 13.53 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.22%)
KEL 4.63 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (1.09%)
KOSM 6.25 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (2.46%)
MLCF 44.30 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (0.77%)
OGDC 205.50 Increased By ▲ 2.26 (1.11%)
PACE 6.49 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (1.41%)
PAEL 40.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.32%)
PIAHCLA 17.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.23%)
PIBTL 7.81 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.96%)
POWER 9.18 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.1%)
PPL 177.11 Increased By ▲ 2.86 (1.64%)
PRL 38.32 Increased By ▲ 0.25 (0.66%)
PTC 24.40 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (1.37%)
SEARL 107.46 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.21%)
SILK 0.98 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (1.03%)
SSGC 36.90 Increased By ▲ 0.50 (1.37%)
SYM 19.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.21%)
TELE 8.43 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (2.31%)
TPLP 12.18 Increased By ▲ 0.40 (3.4%)
TRG 66.35 Increased By ▲ 1.47 (2.27%)
WAVESAPP 11.82 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.63%)
WTL 1.69 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.6%)
YOUW 3.97 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (3.12%)
BR100 11,855 Increased By 87.3 (0.74%)
BR30 35,389 Increased By 425.2 (1.22%)
KSE100 112,352 Increased By 865 (0.78%)
KSE30 35,235 Increased By 300.9 (0.86%)

The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended notices for the recovery of agriculture income tax issued to hundreds of individuals for the period prior to promulgation of Finance Act 2013. The petitioners had challenged the tax recovery notices issued by district collectors for the year 2012.
The court also sought replies from the district collector, Federal Board of Revenue, federal and Punjab governments by June 26. Petitioners counsel Muhammad Ajmal Khan argued that the district collector of the provincial government had no powers to collect the agriculture income tax for the period prior to promulgation of Finance Act, 2013. He said the government inserted a section 3-B in Punjab Agricultural Income Tax Act 1997 giving retrospectively effect, which was a violation of settled tax laws and statutes.
He pointed out that all the tax laws envisaged that any amendment in the law will have prospective effect, but not retrospective. However, he said, the government had been issuing notices for the tax recovery to the petitioners while relaying and misinterpreting a Supreme Court judgment. He further argued that the agricultural income was exempted under the provisions of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.