AGL 37.98 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (1.28%)
AIRLINK 220.00 Increased By ▲ 2.62 (1.21%)
BOP 10.81 Increased By ▲ 0.34 (3.25%)
CNERGY 7.85 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (5.51%)
DCL 9.15 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.55%)
DFML 40.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.56 (-1.35%)
DGKC 104.92 Decreased By ▼ -1.14 (-1.07%)
FCCL 36.58 Decreased By ▼ -0.94 (-2.51%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 17.93 Increased By ▲ 0.67 (3.88%)
HUBC 130.89 Increased By ▲ 1.18 (0.91%)
HUMNL 14.67 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (4.64%)
KEL 5.60 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (3.51%)
KOSM 7.38 Increased By ▲ 0.21 (2.93%)
MLCF 45.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.44 (-0.95%)
NBP 66.92 Increased By ▲ 1.26 (1.92%)
OGDC 227.26 Increased By ▲ 1.80 (0.8%)
PAEL 43.85 Decreased By ▼ -0.67 (-1.5%)
PIBTL 9.38 Increased By ▲ 1.00 (11.93%)
PPL 203.55 Increased By ▲ 4.59 (2.31%)
PRL 44.32 Increased By ▲ 3.86 (9.54%)
PTC 27.27 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.11%)
SEARL 104.46 Decreased By ▼ -1.83 (-1.72%)
TELE 9.70 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.73%)
TOMCL 35.69 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.11%)
TPLP 15.64 Increased By ▲ 0.57 (3.78%)
TREET 28.09 Increased By ▲ 2.46 (9.6%)
TRG 70.67 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (0.31%)
UNITY 34.54 Increased By ▲ 0.99 (2.95%)
WTL 1.78 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-2.73%)
BR100 12,387 Increased By 2.7 (0.02%)
BR30 38,706 Increased By 316.8 (0.83%)
KSE100 115,127 Decreased By -132.1 (-0.11%)
KSE30 36,182 Decreased By -117.5 (-0.32%)

Directorate General Customs Valuation (DGCV) has revised the customs values of cosmetics under section 25 (7) of the Custom Act, 1969. The customs values of cosmetics of high-end brands were determined through valuation rulings 535 and 536 in 2013.
The Directorate received various representations from the cosmetics of high end brands for exempting them from the values given in said valuation ruling because being multinational company, the imports are from their sister concerns and unusually at higher values than those given in valuation rulings.
Keeping in view the prevailing prices of the subject goods, the Directorate has initiated an exercise for re-determination of the customs values for cosmetics in terms of section 25-A of the Customs Act. 1969.
Several meetings with stakeholders including the importers and the representatives from the field formations were held in the Directorate to discuss the issue of the subject goods valuation. The meetings were attended by different stakeholders including representatives from FPCC1/KCC1 and All Pakistan Colour Cosmetics and Toiletries Importers Association (APCTIA).
Most of the participants contended that values were already on the higher side and if further increased, it would lead to the imports from illegal channels. They requested that the values mentioned in the ruling should be maintained.
When the Directorate asked to submit sales tax invoices and other corroboratory evidences to substantiate their claim, no one provided despite lapse of considerable time.
However, the representatives from high-end brands cosmetics stated that uniform application of customs values for different product ranges within a brand is not fair. They requested for their exemption from the valuation ruling no 535 or revision of the ruling.
Later, the Directorate had examined the available information and wide variations in declarations and found it inappropriate. Therefore, the market inquiries have been conducted under sub-section (7) of section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969. Resultantly, the customs values of cosmetics have been determined under section 25 (7) of the Custom Act, 1969 accordingly.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.