AIRLINK 181.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-1.04%)
BOP 11.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-2.22%)
FCCL 46.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.28%)
FFL 15.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.57%)
FLYNG 28.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.92%)
HUBC 142.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 13.15 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.15%)
KEL 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.58%)
KOSM 5.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.52%)
MLCF 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.44%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-0.5%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.84%)
PAEL 46.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.13%)
PIAHCLA 18.28 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (6.96%)
PIBTL 10.62 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.82%)
POWER 12.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.82%)
PPL 171.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.43%)
PRL 34.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.61%)
PTC 22.82 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.92%)
SEARL 95.25 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (2.52%)
SSGC 42.32 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (3.65%)
SYM 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.63%)
TELE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.82%)
TPLP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
TRG 65.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.73%)
WAVESAPP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.07%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
AIRLINK 181.85 Decreased By ▼ -1.92 (-1.04%)
BOP 11.17 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.8%)
CNERGY 8.52 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.12%)
CPHL 94.30 Decreased By ▼ -2.14 (-2.22%)
FCCL 46.30 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.28%)
FFL 15.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.57%)
FLYNG 28.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.92%)
HUBC 142.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.54 (-0.38%)
HUMNL 13.15 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.15%)
KEL 4.51 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.58%)
KOSM 5.80 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.52%)
MLCF 65.50 Increased By ▲ 0.93 (1.44%)
OGDC 213.00 Decreased By ▼ -1.08 (-0.5%)
PACE 6.08 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (1.84%)
PAEL 46.49 Decreased By ▼ -0.53 (-1.13%)
PIAHCLA 18.28 Increased By ▲ 1.19 (6.96%)
PIBTL 10.62 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (1.82%)
POWER 12.34 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (1.82%)
PPL 171.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.74 (-0.43%)
PRL 34.31 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.61%)
PTC 22.82 Increased By ▲ 0.43 (1.92%)
SEARL 95.25 Increased By ▲ 2.34 (2.52%)
SSGC 42.32 Increased By ▲ 1.49 (3.65%)
SYM 14.29 Increased By ▲ 0.09 (0.63%)
TELE 7.22 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.82%)
TPLP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.9%)
TRG 65.50 Decreased By ▼ -1.15 (-1.73%)
WAVESAPP 9.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-2.07%)
WTL 1.32 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
YOUW 3.77 Decreased By ▼ -0.02 (-0.53%)
BR100 12,588 Increased By 72.3 (0.58%)
BR30 37,879 Decreased By -72.9 (-0.19%)
KSE100 117,316 Increased By 414.5 (0.35%)
KSE30 36,116 Increased By 183.7 (0.51%)

LONDON: Aramco's <IPO-ARAM.SE> debt is both cheap and overpriced. That's the takeaway from the Saudi oil giant's maiden $12 billion bond sale to international investors. While a success, it's also contradictory.

The $100 billion-plus of orders that Aramco's intended $10 billion sale amassed partly reflects fund managers inflating their demands in an attempt to secure a decent allocation. But it's also clearly indicative of strong appetite. That's reflected in Aramco's decision to bump up the proceeds by $2 billion, and the tight pricing. Entities linked to Gulf states can borrow at rates close to their sovereigns: Mubadala's  bond maturing in 2024 has yielded around 20 basis points more than Abu Dhabi government debt. But Aramco's borrowing costs are actually lower than Saudi government debt of the same maturity.

The oil group's $111 billion of earnings in 2018 certainly warrants special treatment. That's more than five times Exxon Mobil's $21 billion. Yet the U.S. oil giant's bonds maturing in 2026 cost it 39 basis points a year over U.S. Treasuries, according to CreditSights research, compared with 75 basis points for Aramco's five-year debt.

The obvious difference is Saudi, and its crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman. As its prospectus makes clear, Aramco's sole shareholder can choose to tweak royalty or tax rates should it face a budget shortfall. With 63 percent of the government's revenues coming from the oil sector in 2017, the state's embrace of Aramco was a potential problem even before Riyadh sparked international condemnation after it admitted that Saudi agents had killed Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

All of which implies a more rational price for Aramco debt would be at a premium of 5-10 basis points above sovereign bonds, according to one credit analyst. There are long-term risks to oil prices from peak demand, and the company's earnings - which slumped as low as $13 billion in 2016 - are volatile. Right now, investors are implying that an entity in many ways superior to Exxon should pay higher borrowing costs to reflect the risk of state meddling, while simultaneously underplaying that risk. That's a weird combination.

On Twitter https://twitter.com/gfhay

CONTEXT NEWS

- Saudi Aramco is set to raise $12 billion in its first international bond issue after receiving more than $100 billion in orders, Reuters reported on April 9.

- The issue, split into maturities ranging from three to 30 years, saw the oil company tighten its price guidance. Aramco on April 9 sold a $1 billion three-year tranche offering investors 55 basis points (bps) over U.S. Treasuries, a $2 billion five-year tranche at 75 bps over the benchmark, a $3 billion 10-year tranche at 105 bps, $3 billion in 20-year notes at 140 bps and $3 billion in 30-year bonds at 155 bps, a document issued by one of the banks leading the deal showed.

- Aramco hired Lazard as financial adviser for the bond deal. JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, HSBC, Citi, Goldman Sachs and National Commercial Bank arranged the bond issue.

Copyright AFP (Agence France-Press), 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.