AGL 37.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.08%)
AIRLINK 215.53 Increased By ▲ 18.17 (9.21%)
BOP 9.80 Increased By ▲ 0.26 (2.73%)
CNERGY 6.79 Increased By ▲ 0.88 (14.89%)
DCL 9.17 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (3.97%)
DFML 38.96 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (9.01%)
DGKC 100.25 Increased By ▲ 3.39 (3.5%)
FCCL 36.70 Increased By ▲ 1.45 (4.11%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 14.49 Increased By ▲ 1.32 (10.02%)
HUBC 134.13 Increased By ▲ 6.58 (5.16%)
HUMNL 13.63 Increased By ▲ 0.13 (0.96%)
KEL 5.69 Increased By ▲ 0.37 (6.95%)
KOSM 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.32 (4.57%)
MLCF 45.87 Increased By ▲ 1.17 (2.62%)
NBP 61.28 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-0.23%)
OGDC 232.59 Increased By ▲ 17.92 (8.35%)
PAEL 40.73 Increased By ▲ 1.94 (5%)
PIBTL 8.58 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (4%)
PPL 203.34 Increased By ▲ 10.26 (5.31%)
PRL 40.81 Increased By ▲ 2.15 (5.56%)
PTC 28.31 Increased By ▲ 2.51 (9.73%)
SEARL 108.51 Increased By ▲ 4.91 (4.74%)
TELE 8.74 Increased By ▲ 0.44 (5.3%)
TOMCL 35.83 Increased By ▲ 0.83 (2.37%)
TPLP 13.84 Increased By ▲ 0.54 (4.06%)
TREET 24.38 Increased By ▲ 2.22 (10.02%)
TRG 61.15 Increased By ▲ 5.56 (10%)
UNITY 34.84 Increased By ▲ 1.87 (5.67%)
WTL 1.72 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (7.5%)
BR100 12,246 Increased By 520 (4.43%)
BR30 38,385 Increased By 2008.7 (5.52%)
KSE100 113,924 Increased By 4411.3 (4.03%)
KSE30 36,044 Increased By 1530.5 (4.43%)

One area that needs policy focus – foreign investment in the country – continues to be neglected. Or perhaps the efforts are not adding up. For the numbers negate all the claims that the government is making about ‘facilitating the foreign investors’.

According to the data released by the State Bank of Pakistan, foreign direct investment in the country has slipped by over 49 percent year-on-year in 11MFY19. That’s a decline enough to foretell a grim picture of what the annual figures for FY19 will look like. Total gross inflows for 11MFY19 declined by 22 percent, year-on-year, whereas the gross outflows increased twofold in 11MFY19 versus similar period last year. The net FDI in May 2019 dropped by 22 percent, year-on-year.

The story behind the key contributors in net FDI is the same – China continues to be the single largest foreign investor. However, the country is experiencing what it had been warned about many times – the cons of putting all eggs in one basket. As early-harvest projects under CPEC have reached completion, not only FDI inflows from China are drying up, the outflows from the country are also rising. Sectors that were attracting Chinese FDI, such as power, and infrastructure construction have also eased out, while the prospects of conventional sector like telecom, oil and gas, financial business that once attracted much FDI remain bleak.

One reason for neglecting these conventional sectors that attracted most FDI previously is the change in government’s priority sectors. The focus is now apparently to juice export-led and import-substitution sectors and through special economic zones under CPEC.

But so far, it has been all talks, and no results. When the so-called efforts of the government will bear fruits is a crucial question at this time of receding FDI. What’s more alarming is the fact that while the country attracted $1.6 billion FDI in 11MFY19, the repatriated profits and dividends by the foreign investors stood at $1.04 billion (10MFY19). It wouldn’t be wrong to say that the environment in the country is not conducive of luring foreign investors. Political as well as economic instability along with inadequate sector-specific policies and taxation regimes are all to blame. The need for diversification cannot be stressed enough. But the macro-environment – high inflation and interest rates, rising taxes, lower domestic savings and investment – are all likely to dim the FDI prospects. Until such a time that reforms under the IMF start bearing fruit!

Copyright Business Recorder, 2019

Comments

Comments are closed.