AGL 38.00 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
AIRLINK 214.86 Increased By ▲ 0.95 (0.44%)
BOP 9.50 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.85%)
CNERGY 6.56 Increased By ▲ 0.27 (4.29%)
DCL 8.65 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-1.37%)
DFML 42.40 Increased By ▲ 0.19 (0.45%)
DGKC 97.50 Increased By ▲ 3.38 (3.59%)
FCCL 35.80 Increased By ▲ 0.61 (1.73%)
FFBL 88.94 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
FFL 17.77 Increased By ▲ 1.38 (8.42%)
HUBC 127.02 Increased By ▲ 0.12 (0.09%)
HUMNL 13.70 Increased By ▲ 0.33 (2.47%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.19%)
KOSM 7.10 Increased By ▲ 0.16 (2.31%)
MLCF 44.20 Increased By ▲ 1.22 (2.84%)
NBP 59.15 Increased By ▲ 0.30 (0.51%)
OGDC 221.31 Increased By ▲ 1.89 (0.86%)
PAEL 40.74 Increased By ▲ 1.58 (4.03%)
PIBTL 8.19 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.12%)
PPL 194.50 Increased By ▲ 2.84 (1.48%)
PRL 38.65 Increased By ▲ 0.73 (1.93%)
PTC 27.02 Increased By ▲ 0.68 (2.58%)
SEARL 104.20 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.19%)
TELE 8.67 Increased By ▲ 0.28 (3.34%)
TOMCL 35.39 Increased By ▲ 0.64 (1.84%)
TPLP 13.75 Increased By ▲ 0.87 (6.75%)
TREET 25.08 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-1.03%)
TRG 71.10 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.92%)
UNITY 33.21 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-0.54%)
WTL 1.77 Increased By ▲ 0.05 (2.91%)
BR100 12,004 Increased By 110.2 (0.93%)
BR30 37,321 Increased By 466.1 (1.26%)
KSE100 111,521 Increased By 1098.1 (0.99%)
KSE30 35,084 Increased By 306.3 (0.88%)
Business & Finance

IHC seeks FBR’s reply over imposing sales tax at lawyers’ case

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for submission of
Published August 29, 2019

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Thursday directed the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for submission of reply in a petition challenging sales tax imposed on lawyers by FBR.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah also rejected the stay order plea by the petitioner against the FBR orders.

The Chief Justice sought reply from FBR before the next hearing in the petition filed by advocate Afnan Karim Kundi.

Athar Minallah remarked that Court to decide either such tax was being imposed over lawyers or it was an indirect tax over complainants.

He remarked that how could be provision of speedy justice possible with such burden at complainants.

Additional Attorney General maintained that such tax can be refunded over the conclusion of the case.

The court has to see if there is any obstacle to the delivery of justice with such tax or not, the court observed.

Athar Minallah remarked that the delivery of justice was already not happening as it should be.

The hearing of the case was adjourned till September 10.

Copyright APP (Associated Press of Pakistan), 2019
 

Comments

Comments are closed.