AIRLINK 194.83 Decreased By ▼ -3.14 (-1.59%)
BOP 9.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-2.29%)
CNERGY 7.36 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.96%)
FCCL 38.58 Increased By ▲ 2.58 (7.17%)
FFL 16.45 Decreased By ▼ -0.46 (-2.72%)
FLYNG 27.54 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (9.98%)
HUBC 131.75 Decreased By ▼ -2.28 (-1.7%)
HUMNL 13.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-1.98%)
KEL 4.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-2.51%)
KOSM 6.66 Decreased By ▼ -0.28 (-4.03%)
MLCF 45.39 Increased By ▲ 0.41 (0.91%)
OGDC 213.99 Decreased By ▼ -4.24 (-1.94%)
PACE 6.86 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-1.15%)
PAEL 40.06 Decreased By ▼ -1.36 (-3.28%)
PIAHCLA 16.79 Decreased By ▼ -0.07 (-0.42%)
PIBTL 8.32 Decreased By ▼ -0.14 (-1.65%)
POWER 9.43 Increased By ▲ 0.04 (0.43%)
PPL 182.19 Decreased By ▼ -3.74 (-2.01%)
PRL 41.83 Increased By ▲ 0.56 (1.36%)
PTC 24.56 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-0.85%)
SEARL 102.53 Decreased By ▼ -2.12 (-2.03%)
SILK 1.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.01 (-0.99%)
SSGC 39.44 Decreased By ▼ -1.47 (-3.59%)
SYM 17.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-3.99%)
TELE 8.76 Decreased By ▼ -0.15 (-1.68%)
TPLP 12.75 Decreased By ▼ -0.09 (-0.7%)
TRG 65.40 Decreased By ▼ -1.20 (-1.8%)
WAVESAPP 11.11 Decreased By ▼ -0.19 (-1.68%)
WTL 1.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.08 (-4.49%)
YOUW 3.94 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-1.5%)
BR100 11,988 Decreased By -121.3 (-1%)
BR30 36,198 Decreased By -400.2 (-1.09%)
KSE100 113,443 Decreased By -1598.8 (-1.39%)
KSE30 35,635 Decreased By -564.3 (-1.56%)

Going into 2020, it appears that the local tobacco industry is again caught in the mire. The year 2019 was a year of setbacks for the industry, if recent numbers are any guide. It all started through the FY20 federal budget announcement in June when the federal government abolished the much-maligned three-tier FED regime and replaced it with the original two-tier system.

Recall that the three-tier system, which was introduced in mid-2017, had a visible impact in recovering tobacco topline and government taxes in 2018. (Read: “Did tobaccos deliver on taxes?” published March 25, 2019). But health activists argued, correctly, that the effect of having a bottom tier on the lower side of pricing had made cigarettes cheaper, inducing more consumption and hurting tobacco control measures.

That FED regime helped formal tobacco companies become competitive in the face of allegedly rising market share of locally-manufactured duty-non-paid (DNP) cigarette brands. The current government, however, reverted to the two-tier FED in June 2019. But the industry managed to fight off the almost-agreed-upon measure of Rs10 ‘sin tax’ per cigarette pack. That levy alone could have netted the treasury estimated Rs30 billion per annum. (Read: “Sin tax has fiscal virtues,” published December 12, 2018).

Now it appears that the two-tier system has induced a familiar fever in formal industry. Production volumes have gone down drastically in 2019 (see the illustration), a repeat of the situation some three years ago when volumes suddenly fell, and along with it corporate revenues and taxes as well. There is a simple way to see how the two-tier FED is affecting formal industry, over 90 percent of which is dominated by Pakistan Tobacco Company (PSX: PAKT) and Philip Morris Pakistan (PSX: PMPK).

The FED rate – which is the amount of FED collected in terms of gross turnover – is on the rise under the two-tier system, a preferred outcome to curb tobacco consumption in the country. Looking at the first round of financial results after the FY20 budget announcement, for the Jul-Sep quarter the FED rate for PAKT had jumped to 51 percent, compared to 46 percent in same period last year. For PMPK, the FED rate had grown to 51 percent, as opposed to 38 percent in the year-ago period.

Now the formal companies are witnessing double-digit declines in gross turnover because of the higher FED. The lower gross turnover means lower collection of FED, sales tax and corporate income tax. So the government has to pay attention to what is going on. So here is the duopoly again making the case that they are suffering business contraction because the share of illicit smokes, which includes mostly the DNP brands, in the market has gone as high as 34 percent.

While health activists contest the industry’s characterization of the scale of illicit smokes in Pakistan, now the origins of this menace is also being brought into question. (For more on that, read: “Tobaccos and tax loss,” published December 19, 2019). Be that as it may, the next round of financial results may cause an urgency to address this problem, which, regardless of its scale, is rooted in lack of sustained enforcement to curb malpractices in sectors black, grey or white. Otherwise, everyone should wait for next budget.

Comments

Comments are closed.