AGL 37.89 Decreased By ▼ -0.26 (-0.68%)
AIRLINK 124.10 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (2.13%)
BOP 5.67 Decreased By ▼ -0.18 (-3.08%)
CNERGY 3.75 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
DCL 8.55 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.79%)
DFML 40.48 Decreased By ▼ -0.41 (-1%)
DGKC 87.10 Increased By ▲ 2.50 (2.96%)
FCCL 33.98 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.91%)
FFBL 66.01 Increased By ▲ 0.51 (0.78%)
FFL 10.20 Increased By ▲ 0.15 (1.49%)
HUBC 104.45 Increased By ▲ 0.65 (0.63%)
HUMNL 13.45 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (1.51%)
KEL 4.78 Increased By ▲ 0.35 (7.9%)
KOSM 6.84 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-3.53%)
MLCF 38.84 Increased By ▲ 1.34 (3.57%)
NBP 60.35 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.17%)
OGDC 179.65 Increased By ▲ 7.40 (4.3%)
PAEL 24.97 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (0.69%)
PIBTL 5.71 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.18%)
PPL 153.00 Increased By ▲ 11.31 (7.98%)
PRL 22.79 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (0.31%)
PTC 14.91 Increased By ▲ 0.17 (1.15%)
SEARL 66.85 Increased By ▲ 2.29 (3.55%)
TELE 7.01 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-1.82%)
TOMCL 35.70 Increased By ▲ 0.20 (0.56%)
TPLP 7.32 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.41%)
TREET 13.99 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.48%)
TRG 50.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.80 (-1.55%)
UNITY 26.40 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-0.75%)
WTL 1.23 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.82%)
BR100 9,717 Increased By 233.5 (2.46%)
BR30 29,237 Increased By 866.2 (3.05%)
KSE100 90,860 Increased By 1893.1 (2.13%)
KSE30 28,458 Increased By 630.4 (2.27%)
Pakistan Print 2020-04-09

LHC issues detailed verdict in Mir Shakil's case

The Lahore High Court has observed that no immunity from accountability is available to any person particularly when facing a charge of causing loss to the public exchequer and misuse of public power.
Published 09 Apr, 2020 12:00am

The Lahore High Court has observed that no immunity from accountability is available to any person particularly when facing a charge of causing loss to the public exchequer and misuse of public power.

The court observed this in its detailed verdict while dismissing the petitions of editor in chief of Jang Group Mir Shakil and his wife seeking his release in the land allotment case.

The information laid before the accountability court was not false, which raised suspicion that petitioner committed the offence within the purview of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999.

"His custody can neither be termed as illegal nor improper for the purpose of maintaining a constitutional petition to declare his arrest unlawful," rules the verdict released by a division bench comprising Justice Sardar Ahmad Naeem and Justice Farooq Haider.

The bench rejected all the arguments and grounds presented by the petitioners' counsel including a challenge to the issuance of arrest warrants by the chairman of the NAB and the jurisdiction of the bureau to probe into a 34-year-old transaction.

The bench ruled that the inquiry in question was not regarding a business or business transaction, thus the petitioner could not make out a case to avail the benefit of the NAB's policy/SOPs to deal with cases of businessmen.

"The petitioner however may avail the remedy for his release on bail at appropriate stage, if so advised," the bench said and clarified that observations made in the decision shall not influence the trial court.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.