AGL 38.02 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.21%)
AIRLINK 197.36 Increased By ▲ 3.45 (1.78%)
BOP 9.54 Increased By ▲ 0.22 (2.36%)
CNERGY 5.91 Increased By ▲ 0.07 (1.2%)
DCL 8.82 Increased By ▲ 0.14 (1.61%)
DFML 35.74 Decreased By ▼ -0.72 (-1.97%)
DGKC 96.86 Increased By ▲ 4.32 (4.67%)
FCCL 35.25 Increased By ▲ 1.28 (3.77%)
FFBL 88.94 Increased By ▲ 6.64 (8.07%)
FFL 13.17 Increased By ▲ 0.42 (3.29%)
HUBC 127.55 Increased By ▲ 6.94 (5.75%)
HUMNL 13.50 Decreased By ▼ -0.10 (-0.74%)
KEL 5.32 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (1.92%)
KOSM 7.00 Increased By ▲ 0.48 (7.36%)
MLCF 44.70 Increased By ▲ 2.59 (6.15%)
NBP 61.42 Increased By ▲ 1.61 (2.69%)
OGDC 214.67 Increased By ▲ 3.50 (1.66%)
PAEL 38.79 Increased By ▲ 1.21 (3.22%)
PIBTL 8.25 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (2.23%)
PPL 193.08 Increased By ▲ 2.76 (1.45%)
PRL 38.66 Increased By ▲ 0.49 (1.28%)
PTC 25.80 Increased By ▲ 2.35 (10.02%)
SEARL 103.60 Increased By ▲ 5.66 (5.78%)
TELE 8.30 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.97%)
TOMCL 35.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.03 (-0.09%)
TPLP 13.30 Decreased By ▼ -0.25 (-1.85%)
TREET 22.16 Decreased By ▼ -0.57 (-2.51%)
TRG 55.59 Increased By ▲ 2.72 (5.14%)
UNITY 32.97 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.03%)
WTL 1.60 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (5.26%)
BR100 11,727 Increased By 342.7 (3.01%)
BR30 36,377 Increased By 1165.1 (3.31%)
KSE100 109,513 Increased By 3238.2 (3.05%)
KSE30 34,513 Increased By 1160.1 (3.48%)

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) is legally empowered to proceed against companies in public interest for creating a level-playing field to enhance economic efficiency and to protect consumers from anti-competitive behaviour.

According to an order issued by the CCP Appellant Bench in the matter of complaint filed by M/s OLX Classifieds Pakistan (Complainant) against M/s Pak Wheels (Pvt) Ltd (respondent), the bench has clarified powers of the commission to proceed in public interest.

A three-member CCP bench said that upon conclusion of the enquiry under the Competition Act and in pursuance of the provisions of Section 37(4) of the Act, the commission may initiate proceedings under Section 30, where it is in the public interest, so to do (emphasis added).

Hence, from the language used in the Act, it is clear that the intent of the legislature behind the Act that is to create a level-playing field in order to enhance economic efficiencies and to protect consumers from the anti-competitive behaviour is that the commission has to proceed in public interest.

Thus, the commission is entrusted with the responsibility of looking after the interest of general public vis-à-vis anti-competitive conduct, and to create a level-playing field, in order to enhance economic efficiency in all spheres of commercial and economic activity and that too in public interest.

The proceedings before the commission are inquisitorial in nature and not adversarial; as the commission is carrying out its functions in public interest, the CCP Bench said.

The legislature, in all its wisdom, therefore, carefully crafted the framework under the Act, and we deem it appropriate to refer to the provisions of Section 33 of the Act in this regard, in particular, clauses (e) and (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 33 of the Act, the CCP bench said.

Bare perusal of the above provision leaves no doubt that the legislature, in all its wisdom, has used the word "proceeding" along with "enquiry" in Section 33 (1) mentioned above.

This means that the commission, even after initiation of proceedings under Section 30 of the Act retains the power to investigate or gather evidence, if it deems necessary in public interest.

This intent of the legislature to empower the commission with the inquisitorial/investigative authority during the proceedings under Section 30 of the Act is further evident from the provisions of Section 34(1) of the Act, the CCP added.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.