AIRLINK 177.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.06%)
BOP 11.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.85%)
CNERGY 7.95 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
FCCL 45.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.68%)
FFL 16.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.41%)
FLYNG 28.60 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.69%)
HUBC 142.20 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (2.32%)
HUMNL 13.30 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.76%)
KEL 4.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.79%)
MLCF 58.89 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 224.90 Increased By ▲ 6.73 (3.08%)
PACE 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.67%)
PAEL 46.50 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.37%)
PIAHCLA 18.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.71%)
PIBTL 10.63 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.76%)
POWER 11.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.39%)
PPL 185.80 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (0.7%)
PRL 36.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.32%)
PTC 23.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.58%)
SEARL 98.50 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.86%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 37.50 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.48%)
SYM 15.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.22%)
TELE 7.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.76%)
TPLP 10.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.44%)
TRG 66.61 Decreased By ▼ -3.59 (-5.11%)
WAVESAPP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.8%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.62%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.26%)
AIRLINK 177.00 Increased By ▲ 0.11 (0.06%)
BOP 11.14 Decreased By ▼ -0.21 (-1.85%)
CNERGY 7.95 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.13%)
FCCL 45.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.31 (-0.68%)
FFL 16.09 Decreased By ▼ -0.23 (-1.41%)
FLYNG 28.60 Increased By ▲ 0.75 (2.69%)
HUBC 142.20 Increased By ▲ 3.22 (2.32%)
HUMNL 13.30 Increased By ▲ 0.10 (0.76%)
KEL 4.41 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
KOSM 6.03 Decreased By ▼ -0.11 (-1.79%)
MLCF 58.89 Increased By ▲ 0.03 (0.05%)
OGDC 224.90 Increased By ▲ 6.73 (3.08%)
PACE 5.93 Decreased By ▼ -0.04 (-0.67%)
PAEL 46.50 Increased By ▲ 0.63 (1.37%)
PIAHCLA 18.10 Decreased By ▼ -0.13 (-0.71%)
PIBTL 10.63 Increased By ▲ 0.08 (0.76%)
POWER 11.35 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.39%)
PPL 185.80 Increased By ▲ 1.30 (0.7%)
PRL 36.92 Decreased By ▼ -0.12 (-0.32%)
PTC 23.70 Decreased By ▼ -0.38 (-1.58%)
SEARL 98.50 Increased By ▲ 0.84 (0.86%)
SILK 1.15 No Change ▼ 0.00 (0%)
SSGC 37.50 Increased By ▲ 0.18 (0.48%)
SYM 15.00 Decreased By ▼ -0.34 (-2.22%)
TELE 7.81 Decreased By ▼ -0.06 (-0.76%)
TPLP 10.95 Decreased By ▼ -0.16 (-1.44%)
TRG 66.61 Decreased By ▼ -3.59 (-5.11%)
WAVESAPP 10.90 Decreased By ▼ -0.20 (-1.8%)
WTL 1.33 Decreased By ▼ -0.05 (-3.62%)
YOUW 3.83 Increased By ▲ 0.01 (0.26%)
BR100 12,435 Increased By 81.3 (0.66%)
BR30 38,584 Increased By 460.3 (1.21%)
KSE100 116,633 Increased By 193.6 (0.17%)
KSE30 35,822 Increased By 118.6 (0.33%)
Pakistan Print 2020-05-22

SC reserves judgment in triple murder case

The Supreme Court Thursday reserved judgment in triple murder case of Dadu District involving Pakistan People's Party (PPP) MPA Nawab Sardar Khan Chandio.
Published 22 May, 2020 12:03am

The Supreme Court Thursday reserved judgment in triple murder case of Dadu District involving Pakistan People's Party (PPP) MPA Nawab Sardar Khan Chandio.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Mushir Alam heard the petition of Umme Rubab Chandio against the PPP MPA for murdering his father Mukhtiar Ahmed Chandio, grandfather Raees Karamullah Chandio and paternal uncle Qabil Chandio.

They were gunned down on January 17, 2018 within the limits of Faridabad Police Station, Mehar taluka of Dadu District.

Member of Sindh Assembly, belonging to the PPP, Nawab Sardar Ahmed Chandio and his brother Nawab Burhan Khan Chandio were among the accused nominated in the first information report (FIR) registered at A-Section police station on the complaint of Pervez Ahmed Chandio, Karamullah's son.

Advocate Faisal Siddiqui, counsel for the petitioner, argued through video-link from Karachi Registry that the triple murder was of the act of political terrorism.

He said the accused used terrorism for political motives. He argued that according to the apex court judgment there were three sorts of terrorism i.e. political, ideological and religious.

He said the accused has used terrorism for becoming "Sardar" of the tribe. Faisal Siddiqui contended that in this case society peace was damaged, adding for political purpose the petitioner's father, grandfather and uncle were killed.

The counsel for the accused, Sardar Latif Khosa, argued that both the parties are Sardars and close relatives. He contended it was a matter of personal enmity. Justice Afridi questioned how they would differentiate between personal enmity and political terrorism.

Latif Khosa said if people are instigated for committing murder for political purpose then it would fall under political terrorism. He said in this case two families of the same tribe were fighting for the 'Sardari'.

He said terrorism law was used for obtaining Sardari of the tribe. He said in case under Section 302 of PPC the Sessions judge has the same power as of the judge of Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC).

Prosecutor General Sindh supported the accused counsel that the case should be tried in Sessions Court instead of ATC. In the last hearing, the apex court had reprimanded Sindh police officials over the non-arrest of the two accused in the 2018 triple murder case.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2020

Comments

Comments are closed.